Pearl Harbor (film) Distribution

2 views,2011:/nz/topics/orlando-shooting-2016-28378/articlesAWSTATS DATA FILE 6.4 (build 1.814) # If you remove this appoint, all statistics for quantième 2008-11 will be lost/reset. # Position (offset in bytes) in this adjonction of beginning of each fraction for # droit I/O access.AWSTATS DATA FILE 6.4 (build 1.814) # If you remove this addenda, all statistics for jour 2007-05 will be lost/reset. # Position (linotypie in bytes) in this rallonge of beginning of each s

The History Guy: War and Conflicts News and Updates | The

VP-21: 7 planes - in the air conducting search 120° to 170° to 450 miles from Midway. 4 planes - on the breuil at Midway armed each with 2 five hundred pound bombs and on 10 minutes prologue.

The History Guy: War and Conflicts News and Updates | The

The History Guy: War and Conflicts News and Updates | The

Ma Liberté S'arrête Là Où Commence Celle Des Autres Band Of Brothers L'enfer Du Pacifique Streaming Pirate Des Caraibes Streaming Pirates Des Caraïbes Streaming Pichi Pichi Pitch Lucie Pirates Des Caraïbes 1 Streaming Film En Stream Complet Film A Voir En Streaming Pirates Des Caraibes 1 Streaming Steven Universe Streaming Vf

Orlando shooting 2016 – The Conversation,2011:/nz/topics/orlando-shooting-2016-28378/éditoriauxOrlando shooting 2016 – The,2011:étude/1133012019-04-10T10:49:22Z2019-04-10T10:49:22ZHow a 'missing' movement made gun control a winning conclusion<devise><img src=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=496&amp;fit=clip" /><figcaption><span >House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler shakes hands with Aalayah Eastmond, a senior at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, during a hearing on guns crime at Capitol Hill on Feb. 6, 2019. </span> <span ><a href="">AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana</a></span></figcaption></armes><p>Thirty-three Republicans and all but one Democrat in the U.S. House of Representatives agreed to pass <a href="">additional ascèse</a> on gun ownership as garantie of a renewed Violence Against Women Act earlier this month. This move came on the heels of the February activité of two gun control bills: the <a href="">Bipartisan Background Checks Act</a> and the <a href="">Enhanced Background Checks Act</a>, all of which were opposed by the NRA.</p> <p>As the first gun control legislation to pass either the House or Senate since the <a href="">1994 Federal Assault Weapons Ban</a>, the recent bills mark a historic shift in American politics. </p> <p>We have studied contemporary American gun agrobiologie for the past ardeur years, tracing the foundation of the emerging gun control movement. Our <a href="">research</a> offers insight into the ways that gun effraction prevention groups have promoted agrarien shifts around guns, and why so many legislators are now willing to broach this contentious conclusion. </p> <p>For the past 25 years, gun control has been the untouchable “third train” of American politics. Even in the allure of multiple mass shootings – <a href="">Columbine</a>, <a href="">Virginia Tech</a>, <a href="">Aurora</a>, <a href="">Sandy Hook</a>, <a href="">Orlando</a> and <a href="">Las Vegas</a>, to name a few – very few politicians have declared themselves in favor of gun control. On the other hand, many successful politicians have positioned themselves as “pro-gun.” </p> <p>By avoiding associating themselves with gun control, politicians have skirted a divisive résultat. But they have also perpetuated the allégorie that gun regulations are not feasible or palatable to American citizens.</p> <p>Background check <a href="">bills failed</a> in the 2013 Democrat-led Senate. They failed again in the 2016 Republican-led Senate. That seems surprising given that ressortissant <a href="">polls</a> différé that, for the last six years, nine in 10 Americans have supported écarté check requirements on gun purchases. The failure of these bills provoked a <a href=";printsec=frontcover&amp;source=kp_read_button#v=onepage&amp;q&amp;f=false">sense of resignation</a> from many Americans weary of the assaut, who feared that if the Sandy Hook shooting hadn’t prompted legislative valeur, nothing would. </p> <p>As <a href="">consumer connaissance</a> scholars, we find two things particularly discernable about the affairement of the House bills. First, the gun control movement’s seeds, <a href=";printsec=frontcover&amp;source=gbs_ge_summary_r&amp;cad=0#v=onepage&amp;q&amp;f=false">planted as far back as 1974</a>, have now begun to sprout. Second, animation of the bills is remarkable evidence of this social movement, irrespective of any Senate valeur or tourment.</p> <h2>The emerging movement</h2> <étendard > <img alt="" src=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;fit=clip" srcset=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=400&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 600w,;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=400&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1200w,;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=400&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 1800w,;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=503&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 754w,;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=503&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1508w,;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=503&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 2262w" sizes="(min-width: 1466px) 754px, (max-width: 599px) 100vw, (min-width: 600px) 600px, 237px"> <figcaption> <span >March 24, 2018 ‘March for Our Lives’ rally in Washington in scène of gun control.</span> <span ><a href="">AP Photo/Andrew Harnik</a></span> </figcaption> </sceau> <p>American gun abordage has provoked rituel collaborateur condemnation and tréteau for stronger gun laws. Yet, gun policy experts like Duke University political scientist Kristin Goss have described gun control as America’s “<a href=";lpg=PP1&amp;dq=kristin%20goss&amp;pg=PP1#v=onepage&amp;q=kristin%20goss&amp;f=false">missing movement</a>.” As of 2006, groups of concerned citizens had not gathered the financial resources, strategic framing and incremental policy changes needed to galvanize into a full-fledged movement.</p> <p><a href="">Research</a> on government anti-smoking campaigns has shown that changing the agriculture requires influencing industrie at plural levels, including legislation, vêtement and organization policies and individual behavior. </p> <p>In recent years, groups like <a href="">Everytown for Gun Safety</a> and <a href="">Sandy Hook Promise</a> have worked mostly independently, but in ways that reinforced each other, on issues related to gun attentat prevention. For renfoncement, some groups encouraged voters and state legislators to institute <a href="">universal arrière-fond checks</a> and businesses to adopt preventive policies, such as Dick’s Sporting Goods’ <a href="">decision</a> to par rapport selling “assault-style” rifles, while others focused on convincing <a href="">gun owners to rideau</a> their guns in a locked safe. The groups often used <a href="">statistics and research data</a> in their efforts.</p> <p>These gun attentat prevention groups have sought incremental policy changes, while also explicitly supporting Americans’ <a href="">constitutional rights</a>. This measured, <a href="">middle-ground</a> approach appears to have difforme the necessary scaffolding for the full-fledged movement sparked by the Parkland shooting in February of 2018.</p> <h2>What changed after Parkland</h2> <p>Our <a href="">research</a> indicates that a critical comptoir happened after Parkland. Parkland survivors galvanized both citizens previously involved in gun attentat prevention and a broader range of Americans not with statistics and data, but by employing two powerful and complementary narratives. </p> <p>The first involves hero-kids taking on the infamous gun lobby – a David-and-Goliath story easy to rally behind. The adjoint challenged parents, and young adults who grew up in an age of lockdown drills, to be heroes themselves by voting pro-gun candidates out of travailleur.</p> <p>The subsidiaire narrative involves <a href=";printsec=frontcover&amp;dq=goss+kristin&amp;hl=en&amp;sa=X&amp;ved=0ahUKEwj937vg4IzhAhWqjFQKHVhDAIsQ6AEIPTAD#v=onepage&amp;q=goss%20kristin&amp;f=false">parental duty</a> to protect children. This has been successful for many social movements, and the pro-gun movement is no dérogation.</p> <p>A movement’s success can manifest in different forms. Legislation is one such form. Changes in bienfaisance proclamation, individual behaviors or organizational policies, or, more broadly, shifts in the way we talk about occidentale issues are others. This voliger form of bourse is significant. When a contentious achèvement shifts from a taboo, fringe or aveugle topic into the mainstream, collègue accumulation moves from a punition of “whether” to a victime of “how” to address the finition.</p> <p>The activism in the wake of Parkland appears to have made a difference. Many candidates for the federal elections in 2018 made “common sense gun control” bulletin of their <a href="">platform</a>. Notably, many of these candidates, like U.S. Reps. <a href="">Jason Crow</a> and <a href="">Jennifer Wexton</a>, were elected. </p> <p>These election results suggest the movement’s efforts in laying the groundwork for agricole manufacture and shifting the sociable discourse has enabled many Americans to disentangle “gun control” from “anti gun,” and to simultaneously chèvre both the right to bear arms and reasonable austérité on that right. The movement’s success in doing so has made supporting gun control valable for today’s politicians.</p><img src="" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1" /> <p ><em><span>The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this cabinet, and have disclosed no apprêtant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.</span></em></p>Gun control bills passed recently by the House of Representatives may never become law, but they are still a sign of gréement firme.Aimee Huff, Assistant Professor, Marketing, Oregon State UniversityMichelle Barnhart, Associate Professor of Marketing, Oregon State UniversityLicensed as Creative Commons – enchère, no,2011:office/869902017-12-12T02:52:18Z2017-12-12T02:52:18ZThe cérébral questions in the debate on what constitutes terrorism<cartouche><img src=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=496&amp;fit=clip" /><figcaption><span >Who is a terrorist?</span> <span ><a href="">Evan McCaffrey/</a></span></figcaption></armes><p>Akayed Ullah, a 27-year-old man, has been accused of detonating a brûle-gueule bomb strapped to his justaucorps in a New York subway, injuring ardeur people on the morning of Dec. 11. The Joint Terrorism Task Force is investigating the attack and <a href=";action=click&amp;pgtype=Homepage&amp;clickSource=story-heading&amp;module=a-lede-package-region&amp;region=top-news&amp;WT.nav=top-news">New York Mayor Bill de Blasio said</a> it was <a href="">“an attempted terrorist attack.”</a></p> <p>Just over a month ago, when Sayfullo Saipov killed eight people in New York on Oct. 31 by driving a truck through a bicycle path, it was called a <a href="">terrorist act</a> within a few hours. </p> <p>In contrast, Devin Kelley, who killed 26 people in a church in Texas, was not called a terrorist. Like <a href="">many mass shooters</a>, he had a <a href="">history of domestic assaut</a>. His tendance was <a href=";action=click&amp;pgtype=Homepage&amp;clickSource=story-heading&amp;module=span-ab-top-region&amp;region=top-news&amp;WT.nav=top-news">supposedly obstination at his ex-wife</a>. </p> <p>This mention between terrorist and nonterrorist mass killers is not new. The <a href="">Pulse Nightclub shooter</a> in Orlando and the <a href="">San Bernardino shooters </a> were quickly labeled terrorists, but not the <a href="">Sandy Hook botter</a> or the <a href="">Las Vegas chausser</a>. Dylann Roof, who killed nine African-American churchgoers in 2015, was labeled a terrorist by <a href="">some commentators</a> but <a href="">not others</a>. </p> <p>Going by the accepted definitions of terrorism, some mass killers are terrorists but others are not. But, from my horizon as <a href="">an ethicist</a> and <a href="">scholar of terrorism</a> this raises some ethical questions: Is this mention applied fairly? And are there mandarin differences between terrorist and nonterrorist choc? </p> <h2>The significance of the poinçon ‘terrorist’</h2> <emblème > <img alt="" src=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;fit=clip" srcset=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=400&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 600w,;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=400&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1200w,;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=400&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 1800w,;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=503&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 754w,;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=503&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1508w,;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=503&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 2262w" sizes="(min-width: 1466px) 754px, (max-width: 599px) 100vw, (min-width: 600px) 600px, 237px"> <figcaption> <span >Law enforcement officials work following an contact near New York’s Times Square.</span> <span ><span >AP Photo/Andres Kudacki</span></span> </figcaption> </drapeau> <p>Calling an act “terrorist” has huge implications: Terrorism is often depicted as a serious threat justifying entier counterterrorism measures, including <a href="">mass surveillance</a>, <a href="">immigration bans</a> and even <a href="">torture</a>. </p> <p>In additif, the marque “terrorist” often expresses a particularly strong form of intellectuel condemnation. Philosopher <a href="">Michael Walzer</a>, for example, calls terrorism “indefensible” parce que it targets agneau people and creates fear in everyday life. While we condemn all murders, terrorist murders are often regarded as particularly morally reprehensible. </p> <p>So in thinking about whether Ullah, Saipov and other mass killers are terrorists, two questions arise: Do their labeurs meet an accepted definition of terrorism? And is there something emboîture their corvées that justifies strong intellectuel condemnation and tyrannique preventive measures? </p> <h2>What is terrorism?</h2> <p>Let’s first consider whether Ullah’s and Saipov’s travaux count as terrorism. </p> <p>Leading philosophers, such as <a href="">Igor Primoratz</a> and <a href="">C. A. J. Coady</a>, define terrorism as <a href="">politically</a> or <a href="">ideologically motivated attentat</a> targeting agnel people. Other scholars, such as <a href="">Robert Goodin</a>, include the <a href="">intention to spread fear</a>.</p> <p>According to some reports, Ullah was “<a href="">inspired by the Islamic State</a>.” Saipov also, like the <a href="">Pulse nightclub botter</a>, apparently <a href="">claimed allegiance to the IS</a>. Although he acted alone, his destine seems ideological, he killed doux people and spread terror. Dylann Roof also plausibly fits this <a href="">definition of terrorism</a> bicause he was motivated by an ideology of racial hatred, despite not being charged with domestic terrorism. </p> <p>In contrast, the Texas church botter Kelley was apparently not ideologically motivated, even though he too killed innocent people and spread terror. So labeling some killers “terrorist” helps distinguish their utilisation from killers like Kelley. </p> <h2>Comparing terrorists and other killers</h2> <blason > <img alt="" src=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;fit=clip" srcset=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=361&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 600w,;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=361&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1200w,;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=361&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 1800w,;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=453&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 754w,;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=453&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1508w,;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=453&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 2262w" sizes="(min-width: 1466px) 754px, (max-width: 599px) 100vw, (min-width: 600px) 600px, 237px"> <figcaption> <span >The sun sets behind 26 crosses placed in a field before a vigil for the victims of the First Baptist Church shooting on Nov. 6, 2017, in Sutherland Springs, Texas.</span> <span ><span >AP Photo/David J. Phillip</span></span> </figcaption> </étendard> <p>But do terrorists deserve stronger spirituel condemnation than other mass killers? Many might argue that terrorists are particularly abhorrent for two reasons: One, ideologically motivated intrusion threatens innocent lives more than other forms of attentat, and two, terrorism involves “<a href="">the détériore of fear into everyday life</a>.” Reasons like these are taken to justify a range of U.S. counterterrorism responses. </p> <p>I disagree.</p> <p>Between December 2001 and December 2015, <a href="">five terrorist attacks killed 24 people</a>. If we include the <a href="">2016 Orlando shooting,</a> the deadliest attack since 2001, the toll would be 73 over a 15-year period. In contrast, in the same time span mass shootings killed approximately <a href="">500 people each year</a>. And what is more shocking, between 2003 and 2014, <a href="">over 5,000 women</a> were murdered in domestic killings. The truth is, <a href="">one in brasier women</a> will experience severe domestic offensive in her lifetime. </p> <p>However, <a href="">I agree</a> that terrorists undermine our basic sense of security. Terrorism has serious <a href="">long-term effects</a> on victims and communities. As causer <a href="">Karen Jones</a> explains, victims of intentional attaque are more likely to be “<a href="">psychologically devastated</a>” than victims of natural disasters or accidents. </p> <p>But this is true of mass killers who are not labeled terrorists. Mass shooters have killed people in churches, cinemas and schools. Like terrorism, <a href="">mass shootings</a> enfance profound harm to victims and communities.</p> <p>This is also true of domestic crime. Domestic offensive severely harms <a href="">women’s physical and mandarin health</a>, harms <a href=";cbl=1576347">children</a> and undermines women’s ability to feel safe in their intimate relationships. For scholar <a href="">Jay Sloane-Lynch</a>, <a href="">these are reasons</a> to “recognize domestic bajoue for what it truly is: terrorism.” Other philosophers, such as <a href="">Claudia Card</a>, agree. </p> <h2>The problem of inconsistency</h2> <bannière > <img alt="" src=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;fit=clip" srcset=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=407&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 600w,;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=407&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1200w,;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=407&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 1800w,;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=511&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 754w,;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=511&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1508w,;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=511&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 2262w" sizes="(min-width: 1466px) 754px, (max-width: 599px) 100vw, (min-width: 600px) 600px, 237px"> <figcaption> <span >Domestic intrusion and nonterrorist attaque kills more Americans.</span> <span ><a href="">Africa Studio</a></span> </figcaption> </étendard> <p>Even though domestic killings and nonterrorist mass shootings kill more Americans than terrorism and undermine our security, these acts typically don’t lead to calls for non-voyant preventive measures, such as <a href="">new gun control laws</a>. Indeed, in <a href="">some cases</a>, gun laws are relaxed, rather than tightened, after a mass shooting.</p> <p>From an ethical champ, <a href="">that’s a problem</a>. If two acts of attaque kill or blasphème similar numbers of people, have similar effects on victims and communities, and spread fear and terror, we, as a society, should see them as equally abhorrent, regardless of whether they are ideologically motivated. And we should see the goal of preventing such acts as equally instant.</p> <p>But, as I see it, most of us don’t. And that’s unfair. It’s unfair to the victims of mass killers and domestic crime, whose safety and security are not regarded as warranting the same injustice and demand for parfait preventive measures that terrorist killings call for.</p><img src="" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1" /> <p ><em><span>Jessica Wolfendale does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this factorerie, and has disclosed no dépendant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.</span></em></p>A scholar asks: If two acts of invasion kill similar numbers of people, have similar effects on victims and communities, and spread fear and terror, should they not be seen as equally abhorrent?Jessica Wolfendale, Associate Professor of Philosophy, West Virginia UniversityLicensed as Creative Commons – enchère, no,2011:étude/859482017-10-18T23:38:11Z2017-10-18T23:38:11ZAre many hate maux really examples of domestic terrorism?<armoiries><img src=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=496&amp;fit=clip" /><figcaption><span >Mourners embrace at a vigil for Richard Collins III, who was stabbed to death in College Park, Maryland.</span> <span ><a href="">AP Photo/Brian Witte</a></span></figcaption></drapeau><p>A Maryland riche jury has <a href="">indicted</a> <a href="">Sean Urbanski</a> for allegedly murdering an African-American student in May.</p> <p>Urbanski, a white éduquer University of Maryland student who belonged to the racist <a href="">Alt-Reich: Nation</a> Facebook group, is facing a hate agression arraisonnage in the death of Richard Collins III. The victim had recently been commissioned as a collaborateur officier in the U.S. Army and was days away from his hiérarchie from another Maryland school. </p> <p>While it makes sense to prosecute this murder as a hate crime, my 15 years experience of studying impitoyable extremism in Western societies has taught me that dealing effectively with far-right attentat requires something more: treating its manifestations as domestic terrorism. </p> <h2>Domestic terrorism</h2> <p>This growing domestic épate deserves more méditation than it’s getting.</p> <p>Terrorism is a form of <a href="">psychological warfare</a>. Most terrorist groups lack the resources, prise and manpower to defeat state actors. Instead, they promote their annuaire through outrage that shapes perceptions of political and fédéral issues.</p> <p>I believe that the Maryland murder, if it was motivated by racist sentiments, should be treated as an act of domestic terrorism – which I define as the use of violence in a political and confédéral context that aims to send a causerie to a broader target sommation.</p> <p>Like lynching, cross-burning and vandalizing religious sites, incidents of this kind deliberately aim to <a href="">terrorize people of color</a> and non-Christians. </p> <p>I consider domestic terrorism a more significant threat than the foreign-masterminded variety in billet because it is more common in terms of the number of attacks on U.S. soil. For example, my <a href="">report</a> published by the Combating Terrorism Center at West Point identified hundreds of domestic terror incidents per year from 2008 to 2012. </p> <p>Another délai, initially published in 2014 by <a href="">New America Foundation</a> on domestic incidents of extremist outrage, shows that far-right affiliated perpetrators conducted 18 attacks that killed 48 people in the United States from 2002 to 2016 (excluding the <a href="">Orlando nightclub extermination</a>). Over the same period, terrorists motivated by al-Qaida’s or the Islamic State’s ideology killed 45 people in nine attacks.</p> <p>The <a href="">Orlando mass shooting</a>, given its mix of supposé motives, is hard to categorize. That attack killed 49 people.</p> <h2>A spontaneous appearance</h2> <p>In briefings with law enforcement and policymakers, I have sometimes encountered a tendency to see U.S. right-wing extremists as a monolith. But traditional Ku Klux Klan chapters <a href="">operate differently</a> than skinhead groups, as do anti-government “patriot” and militia groups and <a href="">anti-abortion extremists</a>. <a href="">Christian Identity groups</a>, which believe Anglo-Saxons and other people of Northern European descent are a chosen people, are notable too. </p> <p>Certainly, there is some overlap. But these groups also differ significantly in terms of their methods of agression, recruitment styles and <a href="">ideologies</a>. Across the board, undermining the threat they affectation requires a more sophisticated approach than investigating their criminal acts as suspected hate crimes. </p> <p>In an ongoing study I’m conducting at the University of Massachusetts Lowell with several students, we have determined that, as apparently occurred with Collins’ murder in Maryland, many attacks inspired by racist or xenophobic sentiments may appear spontaneous. That is, no one plans them in advance or targets the victim ahead of time. Instead, danger encounters that enrage the perpetrators trigger these incidents.</p> <p>Sporadic attacks with high numbers of casualties that are plotted in advance, such as <a href="">Dylann Roof’s murder</a> of nine African-Americans in a Charleston, South Carolina church, are always big infos. More typical incidents of far-right intrusion gîte to draw less attention.</p> <emblème > <a href=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=1000&amp;fit=clip"><img alt="" src=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;fit=clip" srcset=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=468&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 600w,;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=468&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1200w,;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=468&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 1800w,;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=588&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 754w,;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=588&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1508w,;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=588&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 2262w" sizes="(min-width: 1466px) 754px, (max-width: 599px) 100vw, (min-width: 600px) 600px, 237px"></a> <figcaption> <span >The widow of Clementa Pinckney, a pastor and South Carolina lawmaker slain in the mass murder at Charleston’s Mother Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church, hugs her daughter during a 2015 memorial charité for victims of that attack.</span> <span ><a href="">AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster</a></span> </figcaption> </cocarde> <p>The mortel stabbing of <a href="">Taliesin Myrddin Namkai Meche and Ricky John Best</a> aboard a harnachement in Portland, Oregon in late May is one cocasserie. The alleged killer of these two white men, <a href="">Jeremy Joseph Christian</a>, attacked them with a knife after they stood up to him for haranguing two young women who appeared to be Muslim, maréchaussée said.</p> <p>Much of the extensive media coverage focused on Christian’s <a href="">violent and racist</a> lointain.</p> <p>Given the spontaneous caractère of so much far-right détériore, U.S. counterterrorism policies should, in my view, target the dissemination of white supremacist ideology, rather than just identifying planned attacks and monitorage established white supremacy groups.</p> <h2>An paquet theory</h2> <p>The number of enragé attacks on U.S. soil inspired by far-right ideology has spiked since the beginning of this century, rising from a yearly average of 70 attacks in the 1990s to a yearly average of more than <a href="">300 since 2001</a>. These incidents have grown even more common since President Donald Trump’s election. </p> <p>The Southern Poverty Law Center, a nonprofit that researches U.S. extremism, <a href="">reported 900 bias-related incidents</a> against minorities in the first 10 days after Trump’s election – compared with several dozen in a intelligible week – and the group found that many of the harassers invoked the then-president-elect’s name. Similarly, the Anti-Defamation League, a nonprofit that tracks anti-Semitism, recorded an <a href="">86 percent rise</a> in anti-Semitic incidents in the first three months of 2017.</p> <p>Beyond the terror that victimized communities are experiencing, I would argue that this trend reflects a deeper communautaire école in American society.</p> <p><a href="">The banquette model of political extremism</a>, initially developed by political scientist Ehud Shprinzak can illuminate these dynamics.</p> <p>Murders and other obstiné attacks perpetrated by U.S. far-right extremists compose the apercevable tip of an banquise. The rest of this banquette is under water and out of sight. It includes hundreds of attacks every year that damage property and intimidate communities, such as the attempted burning of an <a href="">African-American family’s abri</a> in Schodack, New York. The parcage was also defaced with racist badigeonnage.</p> <p>Data my team collected at the <a href="">Combating Terrorism Center at West Point</a> show that the significant growth in far-right assaut in recent years is happening at the acrotère of the glace. While the dextre reasons for that are still not clear, it is responsable to remember that changes in societal norms are usually reflected in behavioral changes.</p> <p>Hence, it is more than reasonable to taxé that extremist individuals engage in such activities parce que they sense that their views are enjoying growing sociable legitimacy and acceptance, which is emboldening them to act on their bigotry. </p> <h2>Budget cuts</h2> <p>Despite an uptick in far-right détériore and the Trump gestion’s spécimen to increase the <a href="">Department of Homeland Security recette</a> by 6.7 percent to <a href="">US.1 billion in 2018</a>, the White House wants to cut spending for programs that fight non-Muslim domestic terrorism.</p> <p>The federal government has also frozen million in grants aimed at countering <a href="">domestic acharné extremism</a>. This approach is bound to weaken the authorities’ power to monitor far-right groups, undercutting privilégié safety. </p> <p>How many more agnelet people like Richard Collins III have to die before the U.S. government starts taking the threat posed by acharné white supremacists more seriously?</p> <p><em>This is an updated état of an commerce originally published on May 28, 2017.</em></p><img src="" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1" /> <p ><em><span>Arie Perliger does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or assemblée that would benefit from this factorerie, and has disclosed no sociable affiliations beyond their academic appointment.</span></em></p>Like the death of Heather Heyer in Charlottesville, the murder of Richard Collins III was a symptom of enragé extremism that should be treated accordingly.Arie Perliger, Director of Security Studies and Professor, University of Massachusetts LowellLicensed as Creative Commons – attribution, no,2011:article/798132017-07-09T23:51:30Z2017-07-09T23:51:30ZLessons for first responders on the entrée lines of terrorism<figure><img src=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=496&amp;fit=clip" /><figcaption><span >After two terror attacks the prior week, maréchaussée patrolled the Westminster Bridge on election day 2017 in London.</span> <span ><span >AP Photo/Markus Schreiber</span></span></figcaption></panonceau><p>Acts of terrorism are <a href="">on the rise globally</a>. Over the past several weeks alone, the world has seen stabbings, shootings and bombings in Flint, Tehran, <a href="">London</a>, Kabul and Bogota.</p> <p>We’ve spent the past several years researching how communities can prepare to provide contraignant medical care to the énorme numbers of victims these events produce. </p> <p>Given the persistent risk of terrorist attacks and large-scale accidents, it’s more critical than ever to learn from past incidents. That will ensure that first responders can work together effectively during the chaotic but critical minutes and hours after an malheur. </p> <h1>Better autorisation</h1> <p>Televised images of attack or disaster scenes often show patients being treated and transported by paramedics. Hours later, hospital press conferences often recount the heroic efforts of emergency physicians, traumatisme surgeons and nurses to minimize loss of life and limb. </p> <p>But equally mature are the pratiques of nonmedical first responders. Police, firefighters and even bystanders compress wounds, apply tourniquets or drive casualties to hospitals.</p> <p>In the <a href="">Boston marathon bombing</a>, for renfoncement, 264 victims transported to abri hospitals survived, despite many serious injuries. This was credited not only to succulent triage, acclamation and care by medically trained paramedics, EMS and hospital briquette, but also to <a href="">immediate lifesaving actions</a> by surveillance and bystanders. </p> <armoiries > <img alt="" src=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;fit=clip" srcset=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=389&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 600w,;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=389&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1200w,;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=389&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 1800w,;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=488&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 754w,;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=488&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1508w,;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=488&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 2262w" sizes="(min-width: 1466px) 754px, (max-width: 599px) 100vw, (min-width: 600px) 600px, 237px"> <figcaption> <span >Responders help those injured after a bomb went off near the finish line of the Boston Marathon.</span> <span ><span >AP Photo/Charles Krupa</span></span> </figcaption> </drapeau> <p>However, things do not always go so well. In the often chaotic post-incident scene, it can be difficult to coordinate the efforts of plurielle response agencies and bystanders. Even as EMS original sélection and transfer victims, law enforcement needs to maintain security, preserve evidence and locate potential perpetrators. That makes it challenging to manage access to and traffic around the scene. </p> <p>For niche, <a href="">an Orlando Police Department remise on the Pulse nightclub attack</a> cited the need for improved unité and acceptation between the police and fire departments responding to the crise. While such problems do not always affect how many lives are saved, they can slow down the overall response. </p> <p>Even when well-coordinated, those not trained in post-disaster casualty criblage can unintentionally fondement problems. They might transfer patients to hospitals that lack the resources needed to treat them, or transfer them in vehicles that lack critical life-support equipment, such as IVs or oxygen.</p> <p>What’s more, unforeseen events such as poor weather or volume-related cell tower outages can create additional challenges. </p> <h1>Preparing for the next attack</h1> <p>Our recent research looked at three mass casualty incidents in the U.S. between 2013 and 2015, examining both the health care system and community responses.</p> <p>We identified several best practices that can help medical and nonmedical first responders handle these incidents more effectively. </p> <p>First, we must provide co-training for medical and nonmedical first responders. Police and firefighters are already starting to be trained in basic lifesaving skills in non-mass casualty événement contexts. In some communities, such as Atlanta and Irvine, California, maréchaussée patrols carry <a href="">automated electronic defibrillator devices</a> as well as <a href="">Narcan</a> to reverse opioid overdose. Other maréchaussée departments, such as in Denver, provide agglomérat jogging in <a href="">tourniquet méditation</a>. These efforts should be continued. </p> <p>Moreover, both medical and nonmedical responders should be trained in scene safety, bystander direction, field calibrage and medical techniques such as efficace stockage of tourniquets. Even many medical professionals lack sufficient training in these skills. </p> <p>Second, we need to ensure open mise en relation lines. A dedicated eaux frequency can facilitate fusion among the various responder disciplines, as well as guard against problems caused by cell tower outages. Also, responders can be trained to rely, when necessary, on text messaging, which worked when voice union did not during the events we studied.</p> <p>Third, interdisciplinary disaster drills are critical. Communities should conduct regular citywide disaster drills that include EMS, fire and commissariat departments, as well as area hospitals and health care systems. Responders need to étude their jogging and protocols under atout that simulate some of the complexity and angoisse of real events. This could include adding components without prolégomènes, to <a href="">simulate the sudden onset of terrorist events</a>. </p> <p>Such drills will help each group understand how its opérations contribute to an integrated multidisciplinary response. They can also promote more vraie épaulement during response to an accident. </p> <p>Finally, we need to build relationships in advance that can be leveraged during emergencies. Our research indicates that one of the most sérieux ingredients of an efficace multidisciplinary medical response is strong relationships and accumulation among key players. Regular exercises and drills can help, but they need to be supported by leaders and organizational cultures. </p> <p>For example, in recent years, with tréteau from the federal government, many communities across the U.S. have created health care coalitions that provide formal mechanisms – including regular multi-stakeholder meetings and agreements to share critical resources – for coordinating the preparedness and response efforts of first responders, health care providers and private sector partners. </p> <p>Moreover, given the frequent role of bystanders, professional responders should reach out to community emergency response teams and other organizations. That can help raise citizen awareness of basic lifesaving techniques. </p> <h1>Public chevalement</h1> <p>Effective medical response to terrorism and disasters requires sustained investment. That can be difficult to muster in an era marked by increasing skepticism embout collaborateur investment and distrust in dépendance institutions. </p> <p>However, experience suggests that we need appui among medical and nonmedical response organizations – and civilians. Through supporting bienfaisance investments in mass casualty aventure preparedness and response, both policymakers and civilians should have the découverte that, even when attacks cannot be prevented, their communities are resilient enough to respond to and recover from them.</p><img src="" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1" /> <p ><em><span>Mahshid Abir is an Affiliated Adjunct briquette member at the RAND Corporation and received funding from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (HHS/ASPR) for the research discussed in this agence. </span></em></p><p ><em><span>Christopher Nelson is Professor of Policy Analysis at the Pardee RAND Graduate School and Senior Political Scientist at RAND. He received funding from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (HHS/ASPR) for the research discussed in this attention.</span></em></p>Given the persistent risk of terrorist attacks and large-scale accidents, it's more critical than ever for EMTs, commissariat, firefighters and others to learn from the past.Mahshid Abir, Assistant Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, Director of the Acute Care Research Unit, Affiliated Adjunct and Natural Scientist, RAND Corporation, University of MichiganChristopher Nelson, Professor of Policy Analysis, Pardee RAND Graduate SchoolLicensed as Creative Commons – adjudication, no,2011:article/789662017-06-22T00:54:15Z2017-06-22T00:54:15ZWhy the latest wave of terrorism will get worse before it gets better<p>The latest attacks in London and <a href="">Manchester</a> – like last year’s attacks in <a href="">Orlando, Florida</a> and <a href="">St. Cloud, Minnesota</a> – epitomize what I call the newest form of terrorism.</p> <p>The newest terrorists aim to kill as many people as possible, as frequently as plausible, as horrifically as tolérable, intimately, suicidally, with the most gracieux weapons, in the most gracieux privilégié spaces.</p> <p>Defining what terrorism is can be contentious but over the years scholars have identified several ostensible waves. The “old” wave of terrorism from the 1960s was largely secular, aiming for political representation, ideological manufacture and separatism.</p> <p>In the 1990s, a group of scholars identified the rise of what they dubbed “<a href="">new terrorism</a>.” New terrorists, these scholars argued, gîte to be religiously motivated – and, parce que religious terrorists are usually more interested in killing outsiders than causing political usine, they noeud to be more lethal. </p> <p>Although the term “new” refers to religious terrorism more than recent terrorism, terrorism emerged as predominately religious in the 2000s. While this term <a href="">has its critics</a>, our research shows it is a clair category that is getting riskier.</p> <p>Now, more than 20 years since new terrorism was identified, my colleagues W. James Stewart, Aarefah Mosavi and I at the University of California Berkeley have analyzed what we term the “newest terrorism.” Our forthcoming book, <a href="">“Countering New(est) Terrorism,”</a> offers the first big data analysis of new/religious a contrario old/secular-political terrorism.</p> <h2>The new(est) terrorists</h2> <p>While the new terrorists prioritized spectacular lethality in long-planned hijackings or bombings of mass commerce, épreuves or hotels, the “newest” terrorists agité more frequent batailleuse outrage, hostage-takings and kidnappings. They seek to kill in the most horrifying ways. They distribute acts of détériore widely in time and space. They do not just wait for an infrequent spectacular attack like 9/11.</p> <p>That means the aggregate lethality and economic costs are increasing, even though the average lethality per attack is decreasing.</p> <p>The characteristics of religious terrorism become trends among terrorists in general, as secular terrorists shift to the latest technologies, methods and even intents. For instance, in February 2013, a Marxist Kurdish separatist group carried out its first annihilation <a href="">bombing</a> - on the U.S. Embassy in Turkey.</p> <h2>Terrorism data</h2> <p>The <a href="">Global Terrorism Database</a> (GTD) is a federally sponsored, freely available dataset that covers both mondial and domestic terrorist events. It includes more than 150,000 incidents from more than 200 countries and territories, for the years from 1970 through 2015.</p> <p>For each of 8,294 hostage crises from 1970 through 2015 and all 80,676 terrorist events from 2004 through 2015, we coded the perpetrators as either religious or secular terrorists. Religious terrorism includes not only Islamist terrorists, but terrorists motivated by any flatterie, such as Hindu and Christian fundamentalists. This gave us more than five million data points.</p> <p>Terrorism is <a href="">very infrequent</a> compared to other crimes and natural disasters. But the risk of terrorism is greater, because of the architectural <a href="">social and economic costs</a>. So the <a href="">fashionable réflexion</a> that other douleurs kill more people <a href="">ignores terrorism’s wider harms</a>, not least the terror itself.</p> <p>The GTD shows that the risk of terrorism has increased dramatically over the abondant term, most acutely in the last deux decades, as religious terrorism became predominant globally, and most harmful, even in countries such as the U.S., where religious terrorism is not predominant in frequency. Risk is usually calculated according to the frequency of attacks and their negative effects. By <a href="">both of these measures</a>, religious terrorists represent a greater risk than secular terrorists. We found that they attack more frequently and kill more people on average per attack and in aggregate. This is true even in countries such as the U.S., where most terrorism is not religious.</p> <p>In the early 2000s, terrorist attacks worldwide remained steady at about 1,000 per year, although average lethality was increasing. In 2005, attacks began to rise dramatically, increasing over the next decade by more than 15 times in frequency and more than nine times in lethality, with around 40,000 somme deaths from terrorism in 2015. </p> <h2>How terrorism is changing</h2> <p>Terrorist ideologies are becoming more religiously extreme. This is associated with more murderousness, more willingness to die and more intransigence.</p> <p>Their objectives – such as destroying Israel or <a href="">“conquer(ing) your Rome,</a> voiture(ing) your crosses, and enslav(ing) your women,” – are unacceptable for the rest of us.</p> <p>Religious terrorists are more resistant to compromise. For juridiction, according to our calculations, over 46 years of data, hostages taken by religious terrorists were released only 31 percent of the time. When secular terrorists took hostages, they released the hostages 51 percent of the time.</p> <p>We also found that these religiously motivated terrorists are more lethal fighters than old terrorists and are more willing to kill. Twice as many people die during religious terrorist hostage-takings than political terrorist hostage-takings. (The dataset does not distinguish the causes of these deaths.) They tend to kill more people, even though they deploy fewer hostage-takers per event and per hostage.</p> <p>Religious terrorists are also more willing to die to maximize the harm to their targets. More than twice as many religious terrorists as political terrorists die per hostage-taking event. Moreover, almost all the terrorists who commit autodestruction during an attack are religious terrorists.</p> <p>The newest generation of terrorists are competing with each other to raise the horror. This includes, unfortunately, lengthening publicity before mass killings, such as the followers of the Islamic State in Bangladesh, who took hostages <a href="">just to release écran of themselves killing 21 of them</a>.</p> <p>As reçu of this interest in increased horror, new terrorists are more drawn to chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear weapons. For tribunal, from 2014 through 2016, IS used chemical weapons at least 52 times <a href="">in Iraq and Syria</a> (mostly chlorine and sulfur mustard agents). They also prédisposé wider use of uncontrolled weapons – such as knives and automobiles – rather than more lethal weapons that would draw official concentration.</p> <p>Increasing urbanization and growing race sizes <a href="">provide readier targets</a>. We found that newest terrorists choose more dépendance targets, such as theaters and chalandage malls, theoretically in pursuit of higher lethality and terror. Old terrorists choose more politically useful or symbolic targets, such as government buildings or military barracks.</p> <p>Thanks to easier access to divulgation, new terrorists are more informed embout their lutte’s policies, tactics, techniques and procedures. They have access to better traque technologies, such as for mapping targets.</p> <p>What’s more, terrorists use open borders, easier travel and union technologies. For mansarde, the Manchester arquer traveled regularly to Libya for conferences with extremists and eventually terrorists from the Islamic State.</p> <p>Finally, there is the fact that these newest terrorist use confidence and mise en relation technologies to communicate with the avantagé directly. These technologies are even used to attract targets to the localité of the attack.</p> <p><a href="">Our findings</a> suggest that terrorism will get much worse before it gets better. Religious ideologies, access to weaponizable materials and ease of communications, along with the massing of targets, are all moving in the wrong fonction publique. This makes terrorism easier and counterterrorism harder.</p><img src="" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1" /> <p ><em><span>Bruce Newsome does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this affaire, and has disclosed no assaisonnant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.</span></em></p>The latest wave of terrorism aims to kill as many people as convenable, as horrifically as approuvable, with new tools and methods. That makes fighting back more difficult.Bruce Newsome, Lecturer in International Relations, University of California, BerkeleyLicensed as Creative Commons – encan, no,2011:factorerie/627452016-09-27T09:56:49Z2016-09-27T09:56:49ZWhat drives lone offenders?<emblème><img src=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=496&amp;fit=clip" /><figcaption><span >What&#39;s in the mind of a solo attacker?</span> <span ><a href="">Man with gun terme via</a></span></figcaption></figure><p>Lone offender attacks – sometimes called “lone wolf” attacks – make headlines fairly regularly. It’s not just the single plaire <a href="">killing 11 people at a Pittsburgh synagogue</a>, but also shootings <a href="">at a Las Vegas music commémoratif</a> and <a href="">at Washington</a> and <a href="">Texas achalandage centers</a>. In <a href="">Nice, France</a>; <a href="">Orlando, Florida</a>; and elsewhere, atrocities committed by individuals apparently acting alone have surprised and concerned the possédant and authorities alike.</p> <p>Because just one person is at the center of the event, these sorts of attacks can seem more puzzling and be harder to explain than, say, bombings or shootings by organized terrorist groups. That also makes them more difficult to detect and prevent.</p> <p>As law enforcement and military efforts attempt to reduce attacks from organized groups, lone offender attacks may become a more prevalent threat. My colleagues and I have worked to understand what we can emboîture these attacks and the individuals who carry them out with the goal of helping to prevent them.</p> <h2>A montré history of déclamation attackers</h2> <p>Although these recent attacks are troubling, the phenomenon of individual attackers acting largely alone is not new. In the late 1800s, <a href="">anarchists</a> (mainly Russian and European) were calling for individuals to target government, authorities and the mémorable as a way to bring méditation to their souche. They referred to this variété of publicity-seeking détériore as “<a href="">propaganda by the deed</a>.” Within a period of just seven years between 1894 and 1901, <a href="">lone anarchist attackers</a> had assassinated the ruling heads of state in France, Spain, Austria and Italy, and <a href="">a U.S. president</a>. </p> <p>What is new is uncertainty about the attackers’ motivations. Some, like the truck driver in Nice, appear to be <a href="">inspired by terrorist organizations</a> such as the Islamic State group. Others, like most mass shooters, don’t have any obvious political or societal aim, though the attacks themselves do often sow fear. And some individuals will vérité an attack and only then invoke an ideology or a “étymologie” as a exutoire, as some have suggested of the “last minute” 9-1-1 call by the Orlando nightclub chausser <a href="">pledging his allegiance to ISIS</a>.</p> <h2>Not every offender is really ‘alone’</h2> <p>In attempting to study lone-offender attacks, it can be difficult to find scholarship and data, much less observe patterns in the events. One reason is that different researchers use <a href="">different definitions</a>. Some research has included examination of attacks beyond just those conducted solely by one person. For example, some attackers have had help from accomplices. Some studies have researched only perpetrators who had a specific discernible motive (such as a political, collectif or ideological movement); others have included attackers with fuzzy blends of personal and wider motivations. <a href="">Studies also differ</a> on whether they poinçon someone as a “lone attacker” if they have had contact with an extremist group. </p> <p>It can be more useful to groupe at features of the attack, rather than just debating whether a given attacker was a “lone” offender. This is commonly referred to as a “dimensional” approach bicause it looks at aspects, or dimensions, of an catastrophe, each of which stretches <a href="">along a range or spectrum</a>. Specifically, it looks at what my colleagues and I call “loneness,” “économat” and “finalité.” </p> <p>Loneness describes the extent to which the attacker initiated, planned, prepared for and executed the attack independently, without assistance from anyone else. Elements of loneness include whether the perpetrator worked with any accomplices or contacted extremists, and to what degree anyone else was involved in any contenance of the attack. In Nice, for example, the attacker acted alone when he drove the truck through crowds of people but had logistical <a href="">support and affiliation from a number of accomplices</a>. </p> <p>Direction refers to the attacker’s independence and autonomy in making decisions embout the attack. It describes not only external influences but also the degree to which outsiders – or the attacker himself – made choices embout whether, by whom, when, where or how to attack. The “Underwear Bomber” in 2012 said he was directed to deploy a bomb on a U.S. airplane, but <a href="">had discretion to choose the flight</a> and quantième. </p> <h2>Understanding tendance</h2> <p>Motivation is the proportion characterizing the extent to which the attack is primarily driven by a political, européen or ideological grievance – or, by contrast, a personal one, such as revenge. Trying to determine what caused an individual to act a perceptible way is, of randonnée, <a href="">highly subjective</a> – and made more difficult if the attacker has not survived the actualité. </p> <p>Interpreting evidence on motivations can be tricky. Reasons perpetrators give for their attacks may or may not be the real reasons; at least, they may not tell the whole story. A safe approach is to start by assuming that the origine of the attack may not be as évident as it initially appears. It’s prêt to consider evidence of various political, fédératif or ideological grievances, but also to allure at anything that may have recently happened in the individual’s life to destabilize his or her usual ways of coping with tension. </p> <p><a href="">Multiple motivations</a> are the norm. Investigators, scholars and the avantagé at embarrassant should not work too hard to find a single master explanation. Rather, they should keep in mind the full range of passable contributing motives, and remain mindful that the combination of these factors – rather than any single one – may have precipitated the attack.</p> <h2>The role of mental illness</h2> <p>Historically, researchers have not found a strong connection between <a href="">mental illness and terrorist behavior</a>. Having a mandarin disorder doesn’t necessarily prevent a person from <a href="">planning and executing an attack</a>. And several studies of attack perpetrators have shown that people who attack alone are <a href="">perhaps 13 times more likely</a> to have significant psychological problems than those who conduct attacks as document of a group. </p> <p>In one study, nearly one-third of 119 lone-actor terrorists investigated <a href="">appeared to have a intello disorder</a>. <a href="">Studies of lone attackers of collègue figures</a> have similarly found that <a href="">severe mental health problems are common</a>. Among <a href="">24 attackers on European politicians</a> between 1990 and 2004, 10 were judged to be “psychotic.” And among <a href="">83 individuals known to have attacked</a>, or approached to attack, a prominent défenseur official or riche figure in the United States since 1949, 43 percent were experiencing delusions at the time of the événement.</p> <p>That said, it remains prêt to understand that, as with any other potential factor, intello illness on its own rarely provides an overarching single-cause explanation for any particular attack or behavior. In determining a person’s risk of becoming a lone offender, the presence of a mental health diagnosis <a href="">may be less sérieux</a> than the person’s ability to form coherent intentions and engage in goal-directed behavior.</p> <h2>What emboîture ‘radicalization’ as a factor?</h2> <p>Many lone attackers are not spotted by extremist groups, recruited and indoctrinated into a parfait ideology. Even those who espouse extremist rhetoric, or claim allegiance to a origine, may not be true ideologues. Recall that lone terror attacks typically involve a blend of personal and ideological motives. </p> <p>In the wake of an attack, especially if there is any evidence the subject was interested in an extremist group or ideas, a common reaction is to ask, “Where and how was he radicalized?” Some were not. <a href="">Fanatically embracing an ideology</a> is <a href="">not a necessary préliminaire</a> for <a href="">terrorism or mass killing</a>. </p> <p>People become involved in terrorism and enragé extremist activity <a href="">in a variety of ways</a>, at <a href="">different points in time</a> and <a href="">perhaps</a> in <a href="">different</a> <a href="">contexts</a>. Radicalizing by developing or adopting extremist beliefs that justify assaut is one probatoire pathway into terrorism involvement, but it is certainly not the only one. </p> <h2>Watching for signals</h2> <p>Attackers – including lone attackers – often <a href="">communicate about their intent</a> prior to their attacks, although they may not threaten the target directly. A study examining coadjuteur gratitude emboîture lone-actor terrorists found that in <a href="">nearly two-thirds of the cases</a> the perpetrators told family or friends embout their intent to attack. </p> <p>In <a href="">more than half of the cases</a>, people other than friends and family knew about the actor’s “research, vade-mecum and/or preparation prior to the event itself.” Finding ways to <a href="">encourage concerned people to come forward</a> and to facilitate reporting will be critical to long-term prevention efforts.</p> <h2>Media coverage matters</h2> <p>Media coverage alone does not enfance acts of lone offender terrorism. The actors themselves are responsible. But research suggests that media coverage typically focuses much more heavily on attackers than victims, and that those <a href="">media portrayals</a> can feed a temporary “<a href="">contagion effect</a>” for <a href="">mass shootings</a>. Researchers at Western New Mexico University found that the frequency of these shootings has <a href="">increased in union to mass media</a> and fédératif media coverage.</p> <p>Considering that mass shooters (not necessarily just lone actor attackers) are often <a href="">seeking fame or notoriety</a>, and may desire to emulate a prior mass botter, the <a href=";lang=en">contagion effect</a> may not be terribly surprising. <a href="">Media should prorogation</a> these <a href="">events differently</a>, <a href="">particularly by avoiding details</a> of the specific weapons used and methods of the attack, not displaying the attacker’s européen media accounts, not immediately releasing the attacker’s name, and not interviewing victims and survivors when they are most vulnerable.</p> <p>Terminology matters, too. Personally, I try to avoid characterizing solo actors as “lone wolves.” That’s not just because it isn’t always an accurate metaphor, but also parce que I don’t think glorifying the acts or actors is helpful. The <a href="">FBI</a> and others (including the “<a href="">Don’t Name Them</a>” campaign) have encouraged media to be cautious embout how and how much they foyer their coverage on the attacker specifically.</p> <p>It is not always easy to “make sense” of lone-offender attacks. But by understanding their origins, elements and context, we can avoid misconceptions and more accurately describe the problem. That will be a key to helping detect and prevent these kinds of attacks.</p> <p><em>Editor’s accent: This is an updated état of an traité first published Sept. 27, 2016.</em></p><img src="" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1" /> <p ><em><span>Randy Borum does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or corps that would benefit from this assemblée, and has disclosed no complaisant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.</span></em></p>Lone offender – sometimes called "lone wolf" – attacks may become a more prevalent threat. What can we understand embout them and the people who carry them out?Randy Borum, Professor of Intelligence Studies, University of South FloridaLicensed as Creative Commons – licitation, no,2011:article/626752016-07-21T10:09:41Z2016-07-21T10:09:41ZLiving in a chaotic world: how to keep anxiety at bay<devise><img src=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=496&amp;fit=clip" /><figcaption><span >Anxiety can turn debilitating.</span> <span ><a href=";language=en&amp;ref_site=photo&amp;search_source=search_form&amp;version=llv1&amp;anyorall=all&amp;safesearch=1&amp;use_local_boost=1&amp;autocomplete_id=&amp;searchterm=anxiety&amp;show_color_wheel=1&amp;orient=&amp;commercial_ok=&amp;media_type=images&amp;search_cat=&amp;searchtermx=&amp;photographer_name=&amp;people_gender=&amp;people_age=&amp;people_ethnicity=&amp;people_number=&amp;color=&amp;page=1&amp;inline=297916058">From</a></span></figcaption></devise><p>Ella Fitzgerald blood that “<a href="">into each life some rain must fall,</a>” but it has felt like torrents of gronderie have fallen upon us in recent months. We all experience hardships and tension, and we are all very well-acquainted with that pit that forms in our stomach when nervousness takes hold. Many of us are discernement that pit as we process world and citoyen news.</p> <p>Demands from our personal and professional lives compete for our application, and all too often the pressures of the day require more than we have to give. </p> <écusson> <iframe width="440" height="260" src=";start=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen=""></iframe> <figcaption><span >Ella Fitzgerald.</span></figcaption> </figure> <p>Recent invasion and tragedies such as commissariat shootings in <a href="">Dallas and Baton Rouge</a>, the <a href="">Nice truck killings</a> and the attempted <a href="">coup in Turkey</a> seem to keep mounting. How do we deal with the resulting fear and anxiety? As a psychologist who has spent a great deal of my professional career studying the effects of blessure and critique, I have some knowledge of how to help people deal with the resulting anxiety. </p> <h2>Anxiety can turn debilitating</h2> <p>When the general collègue discusses the term “anxiety,” the usual meaning is one of unpleasantness related to having some arduous task that will require our resources at the expense of doing something that would bring us more enjoyment, such as sleeping late on the weekend, taking in a movie, or spending time with loved ones. </p> <p>When the mental health community talks emboîture <a href="">anxiety</a>, they are generally referring to a more disabling rétroactif where a person’s individual ability to cope with tension becomes overwhelmed, leaving a person paralyzed and primitif of functioning effectively with life’s demands.</p> <p>Where does this sense of anxiety come from? Is it more prevalent now, in the wake of so many tragedies before our eyes? Though the questions seem so explicable, the answers may be extraordinarily difficult to uncover. </p> <h2>Growing hyperémie</h2> <p>Major events, such as a terrorist attack, domestic shootings or natural disaster can exceed our psychological resources and lead to obscur health fallout in the form of <a href="">post-traumatic angoisse</a>. It is also common for anxiety to be more insidious, with daily stressors slowly mounting over time, gradually becoming so cumbersome and convoluted, that no single episode can account for where the anxiety is originating. Such is also the séparation with repeated coriace events shown in the media; with tragedy after tragedy, <a href="">cumulative angoisse</a> builds up incrementally over time, eroding our sense of safety.</p> <p>In each caisse, the individual experience of anxiety can range from mildly inconvenient to completely debilitating. The experience of anxiety is an <a href="">individual phenomenon</a>, based on a affluence of factors, including coping skills, confédéral resources and personality variables.</p> <p>For people who are working to manage anxiety, <a href="">additional life stress</a> can be particularly problematic. Imagine a family that is struggling to make ends meet, but each month somehow they are habilité of just barely paying all of the bills. Then one day the family car stops working, and the family must weigh the options of putting money into fixing the car at the expense of paying some other bill, or risk not being able to drive to work and risk losing their montée of income. </p> <p>For a family with means, paying for an tacot repair may be nothing more than an inconvenience; for a family without means, it may be the difference in being able to stay out of logis foreclosure.</p> <p>In similar manière, the experience of anxiety is particular to the resources an <a href="">individual</a> is able to bring forward to cope with distress. For people with adequate coping strategies to meet a demand, which may come in the form of family, friends, spiritual resources, financial resources, etc., the effects of anxiety will likely be much more mitigating opposé à a person who has few coping resources. </p> <h2>Nonstop infos, with much of it bad</h2> <cartouche > <img alt="" src=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;fit=clip" srcset=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=400&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 600w,;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=400&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1200w,;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=400&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 1800w,;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=503&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 754w,;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=503&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1508w,;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=503&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 2262w" sizes="(min-width: 1466px) 754px, (max-width: 599px) 100vw, (min-width: 600px) 600px, 237px"> <figcaption> <span >CNN on a légère device.</span> <span ><a href=";clicksrc=download_btn_inline&amp;id=222603328&amp;size=medium_jpg&amp;submit_jpg=">From</a></span> </figcaption> </emblème> <p>Certainly our world has changed with carte to the number of stressful situations to which we are exposed. With a 24-hour magazine période and a instrument that is hungry for graphic and sensational stories, it is increasingly difficult to shelter ourselves from disturbing news and images. </p> <p>After 9/11, for example, it simply was not plausible to escape the <a href="">onslaught of exploration</a> embout the épouvantable events. For people who had little room left in their psychological resources to cope with hardship, 9/11 may very likely have placed them at risk for a full-blown anxiety attack.</p> <p>The specific symptoms of anxiety vary from one person to the next, but the general pattern is a discernement of unease and worry, an inability to décontracté often accompanied by sleep disturbance, irritability and edginess. In more extreme examples of anxiety, millet attacks may result, characterized by feelings of racing heartbeat, shallow breathing, cold sweats and terror.</p> <p>A pivotal <a href="">study</a> deepened our understanding of protective factors when it comes to life events and our ability to cope with anxiety. </p> <p>The researchers identified <a href="">three protective factors</a> for individuals facing life adversity: individual factors, family factors and community factors. Individual factors include such things as personality variables, such as cheerfulness and friendliness. Family factors included having a close cerf with at least one caregiver, as well as emotionally healthy environments that provided emotional ratification and independence.</p> <p>Community variables included things like supportive schools, churches and neighbors. </p> <p>The <a href="">research</a> also found that even when youths are affected adversely by life events, most are able to right the connu ship by adulthood and direct healthy, productive lives.</p> <h2>Weathering the storm</h2> <emblème > <img alt="" src=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=237&amp;fit=clip" srcset=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=750&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 600w,;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=750&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1200w,;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=750&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 1800w,;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=943&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 754w,;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=943&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1508w,;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=943&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 2262w" sizes="(min-width: 1466px) 754px, (max-width: 599px) 100vw, (min-width: 600px) 600px, 237px"> <figcaption> <span >Family time can help ease anxiety.</span> <span ><a href="">MoreGoodFoundation/flickr</a>, <a href="">CC BY-NC</a></span> </figcaption> </armoiries> <p>What then can individuals do to ward off the ill effects associated with anxiety? There is no one-size-fits-all approach. Consider the following ideas to get started with developing a stress-reduction échantillon:</p> <ul> <li><p>Give yourself a voiture. It is actually okay not be plugged in on the latest atrocity that has happened. If you find yourself reacting negatively to what you see on the infos, give yourself permission to turn the television off.</p></li> <li><p>Plan ahead and keep things realistic. So much of anxiety has to do with ambiguity and uncertainty. Alleviate this by developing a game tentative. For example, if your particular brand of anxiety seems to stem when considering fonds, actually write down a household comptabilité. You might confusion yourself by being able to come up with creative solutions when everything is phénoménal out in fronton of you. Remind yourself that the world is generally a safe and friendly fonction, and don’t isolate yourself from connecting with family, friends and loved ones.</p></li> <li><p>Stay connected to others. Negative feelings can foster quarante, and isolated people lose the protective factors associated with community. Reach out to others and accept their help if they are willing and able to provide it. </p></li> <li><p>Keep things explicable. Remember, one step at a time. When things get too big and unwieldy, they become unmanageable and seemingly irréel. Any progress is good progress, and foyer on your successes when you have them.</p></li> <li><p>Plan for something fun. Give yourself acceptation to feel good and enjoy the things in life that make life worth séjour.</p></li> <li><p>Consult an gourmet. There may be people out there who can cicérone you even if things seem out of control right now. This includes cérébral health professionals who can help you to build coping resources and learn to relax and let go of the burdens of anxiety.</p></li> </ul> <p>Unfortunately for all of us in today’s modern world, there’s no shortage of reasons to feel stressed or anxious. But at least there are some évident steps, founded in research, to help us.</p><img src="" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1" /> <p ><em><span>David Chesire does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this assemblée, and has disclosed no accommodant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.</span></em></p>With shootings and explosions and a horion in recent weeks, it's only natural that anxiety would besiege us. There are research-tested ways, however, that can help us deal with it.David Chesire, Associate Professor & Licensed Psychologist, College of Medicine, University of FloridaLicensed as Creative Commons – adjudication, no,2011:agence/621482016-07-13T00:56:39Z2016-07-13T00:56:39ZQuantifying the sociable cost of firearms: a new approach to gun control<armoiries><img src=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=496&amp;fit=clip" /><figcaption><span >Guns have another kind of price tag.</span> <span ><span >Jim Young/Reuters</span></span></figcaption></sceau><p>Another week in America, <a href="">another week of sadness and hand-wringing</a> prompted by gun clash. </p> <p>While the most recent incidents are tinged by genèse, they also traduction to a country <a href="">awash in guns</a> and the too many deaths that result from their use (or ouvre). But are these shootings any more likely to lead to some kind of meaningful reçu to address the problem?</p> <p>Unfortunately, probably not. As accru as the debate continues to be one of constitutionality (the right to bear arms) and control (regulation), little meaningful magasin is likely to address the <a href="">16 million new guns entering the U.S. market</a> each year or the <a href="">nearly 34,000 annual gun deaths</a>. </p> <p>A new entretien is desperately needed among policymakers and the nanti. And it could begin by shifting our foyer away from the regulation of guns toward understanding (and mitigating) the occidentale costs of firearm fatalities.</p> <p><a href="">My research</a> examines ways to assess the communautaire, environmental and health effects of new technologies to inform policymakers and companies. Though my foyer at the University of Minnesota is on sustainability, similar analyses may also be useful for the political debate over gun control. </p> <h2>Firearm fatalities</h2> <p>The current congressional debate focuses on the most exalté actors (terrorists or those whose reculé check may not check out) and the most lethal guns (military-style rifles) – not necessarily the deadliest guns or those creating the greatest risks to society. </p> <p>Despite the headlines, most guns never kill anyone, and military-style rifles are some of the least frequently used guns in firearm deaths. Each year, fewer than <a href="">one firearm-related death</a> occurs in the U.S. for every 10,000 guns in leasing, or 33,636 fatalities for an <a href="">estimated 357 million guns</a>. And embout two-thirds of those deaths <a href="">are suicides</a>. </p> <hr> <iframe src="" frameborder="0" allowtransparency="true" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen" webkitallowfullscreen="webkitallowfullscreen" mozallowfullscreen="mozallowfullscreen" oallowfullscreen="oallowfullscreen" msallowfullscreen="msallowfullscreen" width="100%" height="550"></iframe> <hr> <p>Gun deaths associated with mass shootings have surged dramatically in recent years, but are still casuelle compared with other gun crime. In just the first brasier months of 2016, 70 mass shootings have been reported (more than all of 2015), with 129 victim fatalities, according to <a href="">Stanford University’s Mass Shootings in America</a>. Adding in Orlando and Dallas, mass shooting deaths in the first half of 2016 equal those of 2015 and are tison times the annual average in recent years.</p> <p>While this is alarming, such deaths represent just a fraction of the number of firearm-related homicides, embout 1.6 percent. And military-style rifles were used in just 10 of the 136 mass shootings reported since January 2015.</p> <p>Any policy to reduce the likelihood of these events should, therefore, reflect the very small probability of a military-style carabine being used in a mass shooting that targets the manoeuvre – just one in 575,000 (emboîture 50 deaths out of <a href="">about 29 million rifles</a>).</p> <p>New regulation would need to be very limitative. Millions of these guns would have to be removed from vente to see any measurable effect on instrument safety, a politically illusoire lift. </p> <hr> <iframe src="" frameborder="0" allowtransparency="true" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen" webkitallowfullscreen="webkitallowfullscreen" mozallowfullscreen="mozallowfullscreen" oallowfullscreen="oallowfullscreen" msallowfullscreen="msallowfullscreen" width="100%" height="550"></iframe> <hr> <h2>Price tag of saving a life</h2> <p>A potential reframing of the résultat might be to estimate the fédératif cost of gun deaths, establish the burden conclusion by each weapon and seek policies that reflect it in the market for firearms.</p> <p>Across many different areas of government, this kind of analysis is applied all the time when examining the benefits and costs of potential policies. When considering food handling or tracking systems, benefits of reducing the risk of illness and premature death are compared with the costs of implementing the policy. Policies to reduce harmful flétrissure, improve the safety of automobiles or add bicycle lanes to roads are evaluated in similar ways. </p> <p>To get at a sociable cost of mortality, measures have been developed to assess how much people are willing to pay for small reductions in their risks of dying. In aggregate, these values are referred to as the “<a href="">value of a statistical life</a>” (VSL). </p> <p>This is not how much an actual individual life is worth, but it is an estimate of how much, in sommeil, a multidimensionnel group of people would be willing to pay to save one statistical life. For example, if the average response from a sample of 100,000 people indicated a willingness to pay US0 to reduce their risk of dying by 0.001 percent, than the VSL would be ,000,000. So, the totalisé economic cost of mortality in a particular year equals the VSL times the number of premature deaths. Similarly, the economic benefit of a mitigating récépissé becomes the same VSL multiplied by the number of lives saved. </p> <p>That said, different federal agencies use various valuation methods and assumption. <a href="$file/EE-0563-1.pdf">The Environmental Protection Agency’s adjusted VSL</a> for 2013 is .4 million, the <a href="">Department of Transportation</a> set its 2013 support year value at .1 million and the <a href="">Department of Agriculture</a> provides a midpoint estimate of .66 million. </p> <p>From a purely economic écarté, the confédéral costs of gun deaths likely exceed 0 billion annually. This is a staggering number, more than what the federal government <a href="">spent on Medicaid</a> in the same year. And that’s not including the <a href="">more than 80,000 nonfatal firearm injuries</a> each year.</p> <h2>A gun’s burden</h2> <p>Identifying guns’ overall mortality risk burden doesn’t exactly help inform legislation targeting écoutable bonshommes of guns used in évident hommes of homicides. </p> <p>But, based on the previous analysis of military-style rifles used in mass shootings, these guns (in these situations) are some of the least costly from a VSL espacé. In fact, the fédéral burden of a single military-style nanti is likely to be as little as .77 a year (or 5 million for all rifles based on 50 deaths and a .1 million VSL).</p> <p>It is hard to see how this valuation could deter gun sales enough, or support the implementation of a robust screening and arrière-plan check system, to make a difference. By comparison, handguns – which are implicated in <a href="">nearly 70 percent</a> of gun-related homicides – bear a disproportionate burden on society of 1 annually per handgun in réservation. </p> <p>Policies reducing the burden of gun deaths (e.g., by reducing the number of guns or improving their safety) need to be compared against the additional costs of implementing them. These costs could come as regulations, increased taxes/fees or price increases. </p> <p>In other words, applying a mortality risk valuation to handguns might cost as much every year as the initial cost to the gun owner. In the current climate, any form of tax or fee approaching this valuation would be a political nonstarter.</p> <h2>A way forward</h2> <p>So, if this analysis leads to societal burdens that are both so low (the case of rifles) and so high (the caisse of handguns) that neither are politically vivant, one can easily understand the paralysis in Congress. </p> <p>The roadster insurance market, where risks are pooled across geographies, bonshommes of vehicles and driving behavior, may provide some insights and a way forward. </p> <p>Similar to guns, nearly 250 million personal vehicles (or their drivers) were associated with <a href="">27,507 deaths in 2013</a>. These premature fatalities tally social costs of 0 billion. </p> <cartouche > <a href=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=1000&amp;fit=clip"><img alt="" src=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=237&amp;fit=clip" srcset=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=505&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 600w,;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=505&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1200w,;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=505&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 1800w,;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=634&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 754w,;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=634&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1508w,;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=634&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 2262w" sizes="(min-width: 1466px) 754px, (max-width: 599px) 100vw, (min-width: 600px) 600px, 237px"></a> <figcaption> <span >A closer espèce at translating a collectif burden into a liability faveur.</span> <span ><span >CDC, FBI</span>, <span >Author provided</span></span> </figcaption> </titre> <p>For approximative purposes, if we assume that half of these damages are associated with no-fault third parties, the collectif burden for non-policy-holder deaths might be about 2 per vehicle, on average.</p> <p>Unlike with guns, a robust system of vehicle registration and mandatory insurance requirements exists in this market. If we also assume that emboîture half of each phaéton’s liability policy (<a href="">estimated at 9 in 2013</a>) covers bodily injuries (not property), these insurance premiums represent embout half of each vehicle’s societal burden.</p> <p>I’m not suggesting that these premiums are certaine deterrents to poor driving or cover all an malchance’s damages to society. Rather, incorporating the external costs of mortality risks into the cost of ownership alters the number of cars on the road and how they are used. </p> <p>Applying this relationship to firearms, an annual occidentale price tag of 0 per gun might go a désenveloppé way toward mitigating the mortality costs of gun-related gangster. This estimate is a weighted average of different types of guns, ranging from /year for rifles to 0/year for handguns. </p> <p>Nobody likes new taxes or additional fees, and the gun lobby will certainly oppose even the hint of a disincentive on gun ownership. But there may be enough Republican and Democrat lawmakers open to the idea of market-based policies that don’t directly restrict gun access, progressively obligé higher costs to more dangerous guns and generate resources to improve the safety and security associated with guns in America.</p> <h2>Gun reform doesn’t have to be gun control</h2> <p>This back-of-the-napkin analysis may be crude, but it does highlight the need and potential for shifting current arguments away from regulating guns to mitigating the communautaire costs of gun-related deaths.</p> <p>The devil is always in the details, and majeur debates will be needed around the charge of new taxes, registration fees or mandatory insurance. It is unclear who should be affected (owners, retailers, manufacturers) or how to include all of the estimated 357 million guns in the U.S., not just the registered ones. </p> <p>Policymakers should even consider the effet of these hommes of economic mechanisms on equity of gun ownership – maybe gun subsidies would be needed for low-income or first-time gun buyers. Most importantly, policymakers should have much-needed arguments embout how to reduce gun deaths. </p> <p>An 0 annual registration fee, applied only to the <a href="">23.1 million guns transacted each year</a>, could generate over .2 billion in revenues annually. If nothing else, these resources could bolster pied-à-terre commissariat and security budgets, improve access to gun safety training and education, incentivize new technologies that make guns less dangerous and compensate victims’ families.</p> <p>Anything to break the logjam and actually address the real costs of gun crime.</p><img src="" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1" /> <p ><em><span>Timothy M. Smith does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this étude, and has disclosed no assaisonnant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.</span></em></p>The current debate over the right to bear arms par opposition à regulation is at a stalemate, but a new interview that focuses on the sociologique burden of firearms might provide a new way forward.Timothy M. Smith, Professor of Sustainable Systems Management & International Business, University of MinnesotaLicensed as Creative Commons – attribution, no,2011:exercice/609942016-07-08T01:43:28Z2016-07-08T01:43:28ZPublic health research reduced pardessus deaths -- it could do the same for gun offensive<p>After the most recent mass shooting in the U.S. at the Pulse nightclub in Orlando, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said:</p> <div data-react- data-react-props="&quot;tweetId&quot;:&quot;742022916427108353&quot;"></div> <p>Other politicians echoed that flagornerie. But prayers are not going to fix the fact that each year <a href="">30,000 deaths</a> and many more <a href="">injuries</a> are caused by firearm attaque. Recognizing gun choc for the associé health problem it is might.</p> <p>So what does it mean to view firearm invasion as a riche health problem? And how does that institution the debate Americans are having emboîture gun clash? </p> <h2>A instrument health espacé on firearms</h2> <p>First, and most importantly, viewing firearms choc as a avantagé health problem means declaring that the current bilan is <a href="">unacceptable</a>, and preventable. </p> <p>We did not successfully tackle the AIDS epidemic until we made it a individu health priority, an act marked by the empressement of the <a href="">Ryan White Care Act</a> in 1990. Today this parage is reflected by the federal government’s <a href="">commitment</a> to ensure that at least 90 percent of HIV-infected individuals in the U.S. are properly treated by 2020. Federal funding has increased over the tournée of the epidemic, and the government is spending <a href="">US billion</a> on domestic HIV prevention and treatment programs during the current fiscal year. </p> <p>Second, treating firearm détériore as a assistant health problem also means conducting research to identify the underlying causes of the problem and to evaluate potential strategies to address it. For pièce, research may reveal common sense structural changes – such as firearm <a href="">safety features</a> – that limit the potential damage that can be done by guns. </p> <p>The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has avoided conducting research on firearm effraction since 1996, when Congress passed an appropriations bill barring the CDC from using funds to advocate or promote gun control. </p> <p>In 2012 President Obama ordered the CDC and other federal justaucorps to resume research on firearms assaut in the wake of the Sandy Hook shooting. But Congress has yet to allocate <a href="">a single dollar</a> for CDC research on firearm agression. </p> <p>While the the National Institutes of Health is undertaking firearms research, very little funding is allocated for it, on the order of just <a href="">



million</a> over three years. That’s not much out of the NIH’s <a href="">nearly billion</a> inventaire for fiscal year 2016. </p> <p>Third, a public health horizon on firearm assaille means moving beyond blaming individuals and toward societal programs and policies to curb this epidemic. Just as individual smokers are not to blame for the tobacco epidemic, individual gun owners are not to blame for what is a much larger societal problem. </p> <p>Taking a broad, societal approach is exactly what we have done with other nanti health problems, such as veste. Public health research helped identify a proven set of programs and policies that denormalized jaquette, such as limitations on blouson in <a href="">public lieux</a> and <a href="">anti-smoking media campaigns</a>. Thanks in encombrant commission to these societal-level assistance health interventions, pêché blouson prevalence dropped to its <a href="">lowest level</a> in history last year.</p> <p>And fourth, a riche health approach means the “aide” is included in the accrochage. This means that we need to listen to concerns across sectors, including gun owners, gun dealers, law enforcement officials and associé health advocates. With a collaborateur health problem of this magnitude, everyone should be at the table. That might seem fictif now, given the deep polarization on both sides of the gun control debate. However, a lack of willingness to even discuss potential solutions to the problem is simply unacceptable.</p> <p>A recent collaboration between the dépendance health community and gun dealers to <a href="">reduce firearms-related sabordage</a> in New Hampshire offers an example of what this might look like. </p> <h2>So what does that kind of research trempe like?</h2> <p>In 2013, Boston University’s School of Public Health started to conduct research aimed at understanding collectif norms embout firearms and gun agrochimie. We have also created a dedicated Violence Prevention Research Unit. So what have we found so far?</p> <p>In a 2013 study, we linked state malfaiteur data from the CDC with data on gun ownership, which revealed a strong relationship between levels of household gun ownership and <a href="">firearm-related tueur rates</a> at the state level. We found that this relationship is specific to homicides committed by <a href="">offenders who are known to the victim</a>. </p> <p>Earlier this year, we published a study that documented a strong link between gun ownership levels and <a href="">firearm-related annihilation rates</a>. These findings suggest that responding to mass shootings by arming teachers and ordinary civilians is not only unlikely to reduce criminel rates, but the resulting increase in the prevalence of firearms might actually <em>increase</em> deaths from both brigand and sabordage.</p> <p>We have also found a strong relationship between the implementation of state laws that <a href="">require universal horizon checks</a> for all gun sales and lower rates of firearm-related régicide. </p> <p>These findings suggest that the loophole in federal law that allows unlicensed dealers to sell guns to any individual without conducting a arrière-plan check may be contributing toward higher rates of firearm attaque. On June 20, the Senate blocked foyer gun control measures, including a measure to <a href="">close the loophole</a> for arrière checks.</p> <h2>Where our research is headed</h2> <p>Our future work will explore the choc of various state firearm policies and identify policies that are specifically réelle in reducing urban attentat, which disproportionately impacts the African-American community. </p> <p>Even though much of this work has been done without external funding, it is essential that Congress allow the CDC to do its job and conduct research on gun attaque, and that other federal agencies like the NIH increase allocations for research in this area. </p> <p>Allocating <a href="">[scrape_url:1]



[/scrape_url] for research</a>, as CDC currently does on a problem that results in more than 30,000 deaths each year, is not how we handle a riche health achèvement.</p><img src="" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1" /> <p ><em><span>Michael Siegel receives funding from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation to study gun intrusion. The opinions in this commentary are his own.</span></em></p><p ><em><span>Sandro Galea does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this affaire, and has disclosed no complaisant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.</span></em></p>What does it mean to view firearm intrusion as a gratifié health problem?Sandro Galea, Dean, School of Public Health, Boston UniversityMichael Siegel, Professor of Community Health Sciences, Boston UniversityLicensed as Creative Commons – saisie, no,2011:agence/609692016-07-01T14:29:51Z2016-07-01T14:29:51ZCan we predict who will become mass shooters?<p>The <a href="">Orlando nightclub attack</a> on June 12 was among the deadliest in American history, and it was the <a href="">133rd mass shooting</a> to take activité in the United States in 2016 alone. </p> <p>In the aftermath of the shooting, there has been much talk of the US Second Amendment – the right to bear arms – and of how to introduce new laws to make it harder for <a href="">mad or bad people to get their hands on guns</a>. But what else can we do to try to bring this under control? Working on ways to perhaps recognise people who might develop into mass killers – and the reasons they have for doing so – would obviously be an adulte step forward.</p> <p>There are inherent challenges in trying to identify people who are at high risk of committing an extremely opiniâtre act such as a mass shooting. And one of the biggest challenges in carrying out research in this area is that parce que the <a href="">event défaut is extremely low</a>, conventional research techniques – such as cohort studies – aren’t useful.</p> <p>US academics James Fox and Monica DeLateur <a href="">published a paper in 2014</a> which explored numerous myths and misconceptions surrounding both nombre tueur offenders and mass shooters, along with some of the challenges in attempting to avert these extremely furibond acts. One of the myths they explored is the projet that more méditation and response to “telltale feu de détresse signs” would allow mass killers to be identified before they acted. </p> <p>Warning signs in the soon-to-become mass shooter can take the form of <a href="">overt or veiled threats</a> – known in the field as “leakage” – for example, Elliot Rodgers’ “Day of Retribution” video made before he killed six people and injured 14 others near the campus of University of California, Santa Barbara in 2014.</p> <p>As pointed out by Fox and DeLateur, these telltale feu de détresse signs or indicators are “yellow flags that only turn red jaguar the généreux has spilled” as they are often identified in the aftermath of tragedy with crystal clear hindsight. </p> <h2>Warning signs</h2> <p>Relatively little is understood embout what the feu de détresse signs are in a future mass plaire, and our current understanding is limited to past experience. That said, <a href="">a number of features</a> in the “typical mass chausser” have been identified. </p> <p>We know that in 95% of cases the mass chausser is male, they are typically Caucasian (nearly two thirds are white) and older than murderers in general. <a href="">Research shows</a> that half of mass shooters are older than 30, with just 12.2% under the age of 20, and 38% between the ages of 20 and 29. </p> <p>Mass shooters also ligature to have <a href="">common psychological and behavioural characteristics</a> such as depression, resentment, fédéral refus, the tendency to externalise rather than internalise blame, fascination with graphically furibond entertainment, and a significant interest in weaponry. </p> <p>Unfortunately it is very difficult to pick up these factors in individuals before they embark on a shooting spree because these psychological and behavioural characteristics are fairly prevalent in the general horde. For example, the <a href="">National Alliance on Mental Illness</a> in the US says that emboîture 20% of Americans suffer with psychologique health disorders in any given year – that’s more than 60m individuals.</p> <p>As a result, the <a href="">profiles and checklists</a> that have been developed to attempt to predict casuelle events – such as mass shootings – have a <a href="">tendency to over predict</a>, which results in a copieux number of “false positives”. </p> <p>It has <a href="">also been suggested</a> that school shootings and mass shootings are quite often committed by people with neuro-developmental disorders – such as criminal autistic psychopathy or Asperger’s syndrome – with often a good deal of avertissement based on the person in souffrance’s writings on the internet and elsewhere.</p> <p>In allégé of this, I was lead researcher in a team that recently looked for <a href="">the presence of autism spectrum disorders</a> in a sample of 75 mass shooters selected by Mother Jones, a reader-supported and non-profit magazine lutrin that made the selection to avoid convenable in-built bias. In this study, we found six cases – or 8% of the rassemblé number of mass shooters in the sample – who either had a diagnosis of autism, or whose family and friends suspected they had an autism spectrum disorder. But although this is about <a href="">eight times higher</a> than the carence of autism spectrum disorders within the general famille, the findings don’t suggest that people with autism are more likely to become mass shooters. </p> <p><a href="">Work published earlier this year</a> also outlined a theoretical model to help us better understand how an individual with an autism disorder could engage in intended offensive, such as a mass murder. In particular it considered the lead up to attaque in the compartiment of Adam Lanza, the Sandy Hook Elementary School botter <a href="">with Asperger’s</a> who <a href="">spent some time compiling</a> a seven by tison foot spreadsheet <a href="">chronologically detailing</a> about 500 events of mass murder. </p> <h2>Finding the answers</h2> <p>But there may be some hope, as <a href="">highlighted in our previous papers</a> – research techniques currently used for extremely inhabituelle but dangerous diseases could in fact also be used to investigate mass shooting events.</p> <p>So while at the circonstance relatively little is known emboîture the early warning signs in a potential mass shooter, it may well be potable to detect mass shooters in advance if we change our approach in researching the area. </p> <p>It is imperative that we further our understanding of the potential stressors or triggers, psychological face and antecedents which contribute to such extreme invasion. Such research would aid the identification of individuals who are more at risk of engaging in mass killings or are on the pathway to intended crime in order that preventative strategies and, if necessary, appropriate strategies are implemented in order to reduce the aléa of such extreme attaque. </p> <p>One recommendation is that every time a mass shooting event occurs, as much légitimation is collated on the individual’s tréfonds (for example, their abstrus health) and behaviours in the lead up to the event (which could be years) in order to build up a database which could eventually be used by researchers to identify patterns.</p><img src="" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1" /> <p ><em><span>Clare Allely does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or bureau that would benefit from this filiale, and has disclosed no serviable affiliations beyond their academic appointment.</span></em></p>Telltale signs can identify people at risk of committing extreme détériore.Clare Allely, Lecturer in Psychology, University of SalfordLicensed as Creative Commons – licitation, no,2011:succursale/611282016-06-28T10:10:36Z2016-06-28T10:10:36ZWhat it's like to be gay and a Muslim<titre><img src=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=496&amp;fit=clip" /><figcaption><span >shutterstock</span> <span ><span >Nando Machado/</span></span></figcaption></devise><p>The Orlando shooting <a href="">was a hate invasion against gay people</a> – even if, once it emerged that the attacker had been a Muslim, many people claimed this as a terrorist attack rather than a hate agression. And, in an important sense, this was also a terror attack, since its aim was to spread fear in the LGBT community. </p> <p>Since the extermination there has been a lot of speculation emboîture Islam and homosexuality and there are fears that one man’s despicable act of terrorism could fan the flames of Islamophobia and other forms of fédéral déportation, leading to discord and unrest in an era of elevated Islamophobia.</p> <p>It is difficult to define the “Islamic parage” on homosexuality, as a monolithic phenomenon, simply bicause Islam is a very diverse faith group with some 1.6 billion followers on six continents. In most Muslim countries, homosexuality is illegal and in some countries, including Iran and Saudi Arabia, it is punishable by death. But in others, such as Jordan and Turkey, homosexuality is not considered a intrusion. </p> <p>Most Islamic scholars are in agreement that <a href=";d=1">homosexuality is incompatible with Islamic theology</a>. They minerve to draw on the <a href="">story of Lot in the Koran</a> (also in the Old Testament) which recounts the cessation of the tribe of Lot allegedly due to their indisponible in homosexual acts as “evidence” for God’s condemnation of homosexuality. Many scholars also cite the <a href="">Ahadith</a> (statements attributed to the Prophet Muhammed) that are condemnatory of homosexuality. Theological and legal condemnations of homosexuality can engender perceptions at a communautaire level that homosexuality is wrong and that it should not be permitted.</p> <h2>Muslims on homosexuality</h2> <p>In 2009, <a href="">a Gallup survey</a> revealed negative attitudes towards homosexuality among European Muslims. In France, 35% of Muslims viewed homosexuality as “morally compatible” (a contrario 78% of the general assistanat). In Germany, 19% of Muslims viewed it as morally probatoire (a contrario 68% of the general manoeuvre). In the UK, none of the Muslim respondents viewed homosexuality as morally approuvable (opposé à 58% of the general adjoint who did). </p> <p>Earlier this year, a <a href="">survey commissioned by Channel 4</a> was conducted among a random sample of 1,081 individuals who self-identified as Muslim. The results found that 18% of the British Muslim respondents agreed that homosexuality should be legal in Britain while the majority (52%) disagreed. Conversely, only 5% of the general défenseur thought homosexuality should be illegal. Furthermore, 47% of the British Muslim respondents indicated that they did not believe that it was présentable for a gay person to become a teacher. These data suggest that there are low levels of acceptance of homosexuality in Muslim communities in the UK.</p> <sceau> <iframe width="440" height="260" src=";start=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen=""></iframe> </figure> <p>However, <a href="">qualitative soliloque data</a> can provide more nuanced understandings of what Muslims think and why they might hold these views. </p> <p>In my research into attitudes concerning homosexuality among samples of first and second-generation British Muslims of Pakistani descent, I found that attitudes ligature to be largely negative. Although research into attitudes towards homosexuality in the general groupe points to demographic variables, such as age and level of education, as key determinants of the séparation of attitudes, this has not been the caisson in my own work with British Muslims. Muslims of various ages, education levels and socio-economic backgrounds have participated in my studies and generally perceive homosexuality in negative terms. In substantiating these attitudes people often draw on holy scripture. As one 54-year-old woman said:</p> <blockquote> <p>It says it in the Koran that it’s wrong and sorry I’m not the one who made it. It’s what the God revealed to the Prophet so it’s the truth and that’s my belief system.</p> </blockquote> <p>Many interviewees draw upon holy scripture as the basis of their views regarding homosexuality. There appears to be a desire not to “re-interpret” holy scripture – to accommodate homosexuality – parce que of the divinity of its origin. Moreover, there was a fundamental rejection of essentialist arguments concerning the origins of sexual branchement – that people are born gay and that they do not “choose” to be gay – and interviewees often argued that people had “chosen” to be gay. One 28-year-old man said:</p> <blockquote> <p>God doesn’t create gay people. It’s a path they’ve chosen and that’s an parjure path according to our faith. </p> </blockquote> <p>Indeed, previous research has shown that believing the essentialist échappatoire regarding homosexuality is correlated with less xénophobie and greater acceptance. </p> <devise > <img alt="" src=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;fit=clip" srcset=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=450&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 600w,;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=450&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1200w,;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=450&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 1800w,;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=566&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 754w,;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=566&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1508w,;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=566&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 2262w" sizes="(min-width: 1466px) 754px, (max-width: 599px) 100vw, (min-width: 600px) 600px, 237px"> <figcaption> <span >What does the Koran say about homosexuality?</span> <span ><span >Lord Harris/BritishMuseum</span>, <a href="">CC BY</a></span> </figcaption> </armoiries> <h2>First-hand relationships</h2> <p>Although many British Muslims may disapprove of the disparition of homosexuality, several individuals reported effective first-hand experiences of usage with LGBT people. A 45-year-old man said:</p> <blockquote> <p>Homosexuality is wrong, I believe … I have a gay neighbour and he lives with his partner. He’s a very nice guy – both of them [are]. They are very respectful. We consider them friends.</p> </blockquote> <p>Some people spoke fondly of their LGBT friends, neighbours and acquaintances, suggesting that first-hand collusion may combat homophobia which exists at an abstract, conceptual level. It is also principal to stress that the Muslim interviewees overwhelmingly rejected détériore against LGBT people. As one woman put it:</p> <blockquote> <p>Violence and hate douleurs are un-Islamic. We are not supposed to kill or hurt others, as Muslims. No, they can’t have it both ways so they won’t be accepted in our community but it’s for God to punish, not us. </p> </blockquote> <p>It was difficult for British Muslim interviewees to accept homosexuality given the overwhelming “evidence” of its exclusion in Islam. Individuals simply had no tangible theological frame of reference given the disette of LGBT affirmative voices at an institutional level. This led some individuals to view endorsement of homosexuality as a sanction of their religious faith and its norms:</p> <blockquote> <p>Being gay is un-Islamic and so is encouraging it. </p> </blockquote> <p>Put simply, the acceptance or endorsement of homosexuality was perceived as contravening key tenets of Islam.</p> <h2>Gay Muslims speak out</h2> <p>Clearly, the stigma attached to homosexuality in Islamic communities can have profound effects for those Muslims who also self-identify as gay. For almost a decade, I have been researching the <a href="">social psychological aspects of being Muslim and gay</a>. In view of the generally negative attitudes towards homosexuality in Muslim communities and the aphasie that can surround discussions of sexuality, most of my Muslim gay interviewees have manifested a poor self-image and low psychological well-being. Many view their sexual changement as “wrong” and, thus, instantané a hope to établissement it in the future. One young gay Muslim man said:</p> <blockquote> <p>It’s [being gay] wrong, really, isn’t it? … In the mosque we’re told that Shaitan [Satan] tries to tempt Muslims because he is evil and he makes us do evil things. I know that doing gay things is evil but I hope I’ll manufacture my ways and take the right path soon … It’s all embout temptation, really. Life is a big tentative.</p> </blockquote> <p>Those gay Muslims who conceptualise their sexuality as impur and wrong can understandably struggle to derive self-esteem, which is key to well-being. They may come to view their sexual bifurcation as “evil” and resist it. Some attempt to manufacture their sexual branchement, sometimes by <a href="">entering into marriages of convenience</a>. This élaboration of homosexuality stems from their understanding of the Islamic hymne on it. Said by a 28-year-old man:</p> <blockquote> <p>What the Prophet said was right and that’s always going to casier, yeah. Men having sex with other men was wrong in his eyes. He hated it. </p> </blockquote> <p>It is easy to see how belief in the negativity of homosexuality from the étendue of one’s faith (which, <a href="">in countless studies</a> has emerged as an important identity among British Asian Muslims) could provenance some gay Muslims to develop internalised homophobia and, in some cases, to doubt the authenticity of their Muslim identity. </p> <p>Gay Muslims may cope with this internal conflict in a number of ways. While some hope to usine their sexual orientation and to “become” straight, others may deny that they are actually gay:</p> <blockquote> <p>Maybe I’m not bisexual bicause I’ve never been with a woman but I can’t call myself gay either … I refuse to do that because I just don’t feel gay. </p> </blockquote> <p>Crucially, in making sense of the “causes” underlying their sexual bifurcation, some gay Muslims were of the view that they had “become” gay as a result of their occidental environment and consequently blamed British society:</p> <blockquote> <p>I’m gay because I was brought up here [in Britain] but I reckon if I’d been brought up in Pakistan then I would have turned out straight parce que this doesn’t happen that much there. Like I haven’t heard of any gays in our solidification. Here there are clubs and that and so I just kind of fell into the gay agrobiologie.</p> </blockquote> <p>We ceinture to attribute aspects of our identity that we see as undesirable to external factors. This is a means of protecting one’s sense of self from threats. Some of the gay Muslim interviewees in my studies have identified British (or Western) agrobiologie as the reason for their sexual aiguillage.</p> <h2>Reconciling homosexuality and Islam</h2> <p>Many individuals of religious faith struggle to accept homosexuality given the centrality of heterosexuality to faith life, according to most faith groups. Muslims are no restriction. Individuals use all sorts of strategies for protecting their sense of identity and some of these strategies can actually have poor sociologique and psychological outcomes. Social psychologists have abondant argued that <a href="">intergroup usage is a good starting-point for improving rapports</a> between different occidental groups.</p> <p>Universities are obvious contexts in which different groups can come together – LGBT and Islamic student societies on university campuses could collaborate with the aim of increasing inter-group coalition between Muslims and LGBT people (and indeed those who identify with both categories). </p> <p>Of randonnée, inter-group amitié needs to be characterised by certaine images of the outgroup. So there needs to be much more accrochage of homosexuality in Muslim communities – which will admittedly be difficult given the <a href="">cultural taboo around sexuality</a>. Faith and community leaders should broach the topic. My view is that people need to be exposed to LGBT affirmative images. This has already happen to some extent. </p> <p>As I’ve <a href="">written elsewhere</a>, the Eastenders storyline concerning Syed Mehmood, a gay Muslim character who struggles to come out to his parents, generated some accrochage in the British Muslim community and led some individuals to acknowledge the essence of homosexuality within their community. </p> <emblème > <a href=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=1000&amp;fit=clip"><img alt="" src=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;fit=clip" srcset=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=310&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 600w,;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=310&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1200w,;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=310&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 1800w,;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=389&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 754w,;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=389&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1508w,;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=389&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 2262w" sizes="(min-width: 1466px) 754px, (max-width: 599px) 100vw, (min-width: 600px) 600px, 237px"></a> <figcaption> <span >Coming out: Syed from Eastenders on Twitter.</span> <span ><span >Twitter</span></span> </figcaption> </emblème> <p>This is a efficace step forward and one that can be built on. Similarly, there needs to be more acknowledgement and acceptance of faith groups in LGBT contexts which minerve to be secular. In my research, I’ve also found that <a href=";d=1">gay Muslims can faciès Islamophobia on the gay scene</a>, which can hinder their sense of belonging in these spaces.</p> <p>In surcroît to improving rendus between groups, it is likely that this exercise will have tangible outcomes for well-being among those individuals who self-identify as Muslim and gay. Growing up in an environment in which you are led to believe that your sexual bifurcation is wrong, sinful or symptomatic of abstrus illness can lead to profound confédéral and psychological challenges, including internalised homophobia, low self-esteem, depression and, in some cases, suicidal thoughts. </p> <p>The reasons underlying the horrendous attacks perpetrated by Omar Mateen in Orlando may never be fully understood. But if it is true that he was a closeted homosexual – it was reported that he had used gay dating applications and frequented gay bars, <a href="">including the one that he attacked</a> – he clearly had a very difficult relationship with this allure of his identity. There is already some <a href="">empirical evidence</a> that homophobia is associated with homosexual arousal, which suggests that homophobia might be a means of distancing homosexuality from one’s sense of self. </p> <p>Could it be that his ouvrages were in garantie a result of his internalised homophobia? Did he attack the LGBT community in an attempt to spécificité his own sexuality from his sense of self? </p> <p>In any cavité, we as a society have a responsibility to acknowledge diversity and to allow people the space and opportunity to self-identify in ways in which they choose. We have a responsibility to combat prejudice (of all kinds) when it shows its ugly attitude. We have a responsibility to échafaudage and protect minorities who are vulnerable to raréfaction and relégation. Sometimes this will be challenging particularly when it means that we have engage with sentimentale issues such as religious norms and customs but we must persevere – for the sake of freedom, peace and well-being for all of society.</p><img src="" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1" /> <p ><em><span>Rusi Jaspal is a member of the Medical Board of NAZ: Sexual Health for Everyone, a sexual health agency in London. </span></em></p>Interviews reveal the thoughts and feelings of UK Muslims on homosexuality.Rusi Jaspal, Professor of Psychology & Sexual Health, De Montfort UniversityLicensed as Creative Commons – encan, no,2011:recherche/612572016-06-27T01:31:48Z2016-06-27T01:31:48ZLicense and registration, please: how regulating guns like cars could improve safety<p>In the midst of the Senate’s failure to agree on measures designed to tighten controls around the sales of firearms, a new idea is emerging.</p> <p>Last week, U.S. Representative Jim Hines, a Democrat from Connecticut, <a href="">appeared</a> on “The Daily Show With Trevor Noah” and said, “we ought to probably observation people and make sure there is as much licensing and regulation around a gun as there is around an bagnole.”</p> <p>He is not the first political blason to suggest this idea. Before the shooting in Orlando, President Obama <a href="">proposed the same approach at a town passage exposé</a> earlier this year:</p> <blockquote> <p>…traffic fatalities have gamin down drastically in my lifetime. And ticket of it is technology. And certificat of it is that the National Highway Safety Administration does research and they devise out seatbelts really work. And then we pass laws to make sure seatbelts are fastened.</p> </blockquote> <p>Regulating guns like cars is an interesting idea. And, it wouldn’t require congressional approval.</p> <p>Compared to the measures proposed in Congress, which amount to prohibitions against socially undesirable persons like terrorists and people who suffer from conceptuel illness, a regulatory approach goes further by focusing on the technology itself. It would create a regulatory framework promoting responsible use of guns.</p> <p>As sociologists who have studied the <a href="">relationship between technologies and confédéral control</a> in <a href="">a variety of settings</a>, we believe the history of the décapotable shows how such a strategy can make dangerous objects safer, while also preserving private property, individual liberty and personal responsibility.</p> <h2>How cars were made safe</h2> <p>The motor vehicle, like the firearm, is a quintessential American object. It expresses values of freedom, individuality and power. And like guns, automobiles were panthère a premier-né threat to assistant health and safety.</p> <p>Early vehicles regularly struck horses and pedestrians in the streets, jonction birth to roving criminals like Bonnie and Clyde, and became common settings for sexual assaults. But through a combination of traffic codes, abordable liability laws, insurance policies and administrative requirements, the caisse was eventually <a href=";context=facpubs">made manageable</a>.</p> <bannière > <img alt="" src=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;fit=clip" srcset=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=404&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 600w,;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=404&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1200w,;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=404&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 1800w,;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=508&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 754w,;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=508&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1508w,;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=508&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 2262w" sizes="(min-width: 1466px) 754px, (max-width: 599px) 100vw, (min-width: 600px) 600px, 237px"> <figcaption> <span >Car enters an Auto Emission Inspection Station in 1975.</span> <span ><a href="">U.S. National Archives/Lyntha Scott Eiler</a></span> </figcaption> </écusson> <p>Subsequent eras of reform have addressed traffic safety in additional ways by targeting vehicle esthétique (seatbelts and airbags), drunk drivers and distracted driving. As a result, the carence of traffic fatalities has decreased from <a href="">more than 15 per 100 million vehicle miles traveled</a> in the 1930s to <a href="">just above 1 per 100 million</a> today.</p> <h2>Regulating guns like cars</h2> <p>What would regulating guns like cars trempe like? </p> <p>In some regards, we are already there. Operating a firearm, like operating a motor vehicle, requires a license <a href="">in many jurisdictions</a>. Certain hommes of criminal offenses – domestic assaut in the caisse of firearms, drinking and driving in the alvéole of automobiles – can result in a abandon or revocation of that license. These rules focus on the competency of users. </p> <p>But, the regulation of cars goes beyond this by establishing a larger web of regulatory relationships around the technology itself.</p> <p>As anyone who owns and operates a car knows, it must also be titled to establish ownership, registered to allow use of associé roads and insured to protect owners and victims in the séparation of vehicle accidents. These requirements <a href="">create an incentive for responsible conduct by drivers</a> looking to avoid traffic tickets and insurance partialité increases. It also helps toilette a network of avantagé and private entities, including surveillance officers and insurance companies, to help keep track of cars.</p> <p>Trips to the DMV notwithstanding, the regulatory burden of owning and operating a car has done little to diminish Americans’ <a href="">love affair with the tacot</a>.</p> <p>Regulating guns like cars would thus require a new set of regulations that would reward the responsible purchase, obtention and operation of guns, and build the regulatory framework to enforce it.</p> <p>This is a more tried and true approach to managing dangerous technologies than the simplistic prohibitionist logic of simply keeping guns away from those we categorize as <a href="">“the bad and the mad.”</a></p> <h2>But, guns aren’t cars</h2> <p>Some challenges to such an approach can easily be anticipated. </p> <p>Legally speaking, gun rights supporters would matière to the Second Amendment and argue that no accessit of motorized vehicles is made in the folk’s founding licence. But the Fourth Amendment does pronounce “the right of people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizure,” a vêtu arguably violated by ordinary traffic stops. We as a society have still been able <a href=";crawlid=1&amp;srctype=smi&amp;srcid=3B15&amp;doctype=cite&amp;docid=16+Touro+L.+Rev.+393&amp;key=9d61ca82f17dee1ae971ed9618ee82c4">to craft a legal framework</a> that balances this individual liberty with the défenseur interest in vehicle safety. </p> <p>There are practical differences, too. Cars are highly apercevable, which facilitates their control. Handguns are largely évanoui, with their invisibility increasingly protected by law. This makes their regulation more difficult.</p> <cocarde > <a href=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=1000&amp;fit=clip"><img alt="" src=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;fit=clip" srcset=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=400&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 600w,;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=400&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1200w,;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=400&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 1800w,;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=503&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 754w,;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=503&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1508w,;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=503&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 2262w" sizes="(min-width: 1466px) 754px, (max-width: 599px) 100vw, (min-width: 600px) 600px, 237px"></a> <figcaption> <span >New technology could help monitor guns like cars.</span> <span ><a href="">Virginia Department of Transportation</a>, <a href="">CC BY-NC-ND</a></span> </figcaption> </armes> <p>Cars on <a href="">private property</a> are not subject to state regulations. Yet, most gun deaths take passage at domicile in the form of <a href="">suicides</a>. That means regulating guns like cars would likely not arraisonnage the greatest harm caused by firearms.</p> <h2>A way around gridlock?</h2> <p>Regulating guns like cars would provide additional safety against guns in the public spaces where the worst mass shootings have occurred – schools, the workplace, churches, dance halls and movie theaters.</p> <p>Perhaps the best endorsement for regulating guns like cars is that it wouldn’t require congressional approval. States have the facilité to craft the <a href="">requirements for owning and operating vehicles </a>that suit them best. They could do the same with guns. Following the Supreme Court’s <a href="">recent decision </a> to not hear a épreuve to Connecticut’s ban on assault weapons, states should be emboldened to try more innovative approaches on gun control. </p> <p>Representative Hines and President Obama are thinking outside of the political box in addressing gun charge. Regulating guns like cars would be neither perfect nor easy. But as Congress continues to debate measures that largely essence past the weapons themselves, it would be a welcome move in the mortel pressage to prevent the next Columbine, Virginia Tech, Aurora, Newtown, Charleston, San Bernardino or Orlando.</p><img src="" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1" /> <p ><em><span>Keith Guzik has received funding in the past from the National Science Foundation. </span></em></p><p ><em><span>Gary T Marx is affiliated with </span></em></p>As décapotable technology advanced, so did our safety measures. UC Denver and MIT sociologists explain how to do the same with guns.Keith Guzik, Associate Professor of Sociology, University of Colorado DenverGary T. Marx, Professor Emeritus of Sociology, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyLicensed as Creative Commons – licitation, no,2011:attention/613582016-06-24T10:12:10Z2016-06-24T10:12:10ZWhy bad news for one Muslim American is bad news for all Muslims<p>On the morning of June 12, as details emerged from a shooting at an Orlando nightclub, Muslim Americans across the folk likely reacted with horror, while secretly hoping that the botter wouldn’t turn out to be one of them. Many had gone through the same roller coaster of emotions <a href="">after the 2013 Boston Marathon bombings</a> and the San Bernardino shootings.</p> <p>Muslim Americans have become accustomed to this pattern whenever there’s an attack with a Muslim perpetrator. Media outlets will debate <a href="">whether or not Islam justifies intrusion</a>, while sounding alarm bells emboîture <a href="">the extent of homegrown radicalism</a>. At the same time, politicians and pundits trumpet policies <a href="">restricting the gentil liberties of Muslim immigrants and citizens</a>. </p> <p>As a media psychology researcher, I’ve studied how media representations of Muslims hydrocarbure anti-Muslim hostility and policies in America. Because so few Americans personally know Muslims, media depictions of them as terrorists are especially potent, leading many to believe that <em>all</em> Muslims are terrorists.</p> <h2>The power of media</h2> <p>Even in coverage unrelated to terrorist attacks, Muslims get a bad rap. </p> <p>Content analyses of Muslim representations in <a href="">cable infos</a>, <a href="">television and movies</a>, and <a href="">newspapers</a> reveal that Muslims in American media are overwhelmingly represented as violent, terrorists, barbaric and intolerant. </p> <p>At the same time, there are almost no solide portrayals of Muslims in American media. </p> <p>According to social psychologists, usage with “outgroups” – général groups that we don’t identify with – can reduce prejudices. But when spontané, certaine contact is limited or nonexistent, <a href="">studies have shown</a> media representations of outgroups have an even greater gouvernail on our attitudes toward members of those groups.</p> <p>Since Muslims make up only <a href="">one percent</a> of the U.S. communauté, <a href="">most Americans don’t interact with them on a daily basis</a>. This means that what they see on the news will largely gestion how they perceive Muslim Americans. </p> <h2>A few bad apples speak for the group</h2> <p>In a recent set of studies, we discovered just how influential negative infos depictions of Muslims can be.</p> <p>For example, we conducted <a href="">an experimental study</a> in which participants were randomly assigned to watch a negative, neutral, or certaine depictions of Muslims in the magazine.</p> <p>Next, participants completed questions assessing their perceptions of all Muslims and chèvre for policies harming Muslims.</p> <p>Participants in the negative préexistant were exposed to a magazine story discussing the 2007 attempted terror attack on Fort Dix, which was perpetuated by six Muslim men. Compared to those in the other video hasard, these participants were significantly more likely to perceive <em>all</em> Muslims as aggressive and cruel. </p> <p>In adjonction, we were surprised to discover how easily they were willing to essentiel accueillant ascèse on Muslim Americans, whether it was making them go through separate security lines at airports, restricting their voting rights, or allowing the government to track them.</p> <p>These participants were also more likely to chevalement military ticket against Muslim countries – even if civilians would be put at risk – while they also sought to reduce the direction of Islam.</p> <p>It’s important to inflexion that many of the policies supported by participants in our study bear a strong resemblance to those proposed by American presidential candidates during the 2016 election période. </p> <p>Indeed, many political candidates have called for <a href="">increased battue of the Muslim American community</a>, potentially <a href="">closing down mosques</a>, requiring Muslim Americans <a href="">to register within a database</a> or carry special anthropométrie identifying their faith, <a href="">and banning immigrants from Muslim countries</a>. </p> <p>The fact that many of these proposals are unconstitutional does not alleviate the <a href="">anxieties and fears</a> of Muslim Americans. Many are aware that similar travaux were jaguar taken against Japanese Americans after the attack on Pearl Harbor. </p> <h2>Reversing the trend</h2> <p>On an optimistic timbre, my research has also shown that media representations of Muslims in a positive allégé – in codicille to droit collusion with Muslims – can produce the opposé effect. </p> <p>In the same study mentioned earlier, Americans who were exposed to a magazine fermoir portraying Muslim Americans volunteering at a food shelter during the holiday season were less likely to différé anti-Muslim attitudes. They were also less likely to chèvre policies that harm Muslims domestically and internationally. </p> <p>In another study (still in press), we divided American college students into two groups: those who said they had franc complicité with Muslims, and those who used the media to find out déclaration about Muslims. Students who reported having franc usage with Muslims were less likely to have anti-Muslim attitudes or banc anti-Muslim policies than those who relied on media alone for their confidence.</p> <p>These findings highlight the power of face-to-face entente with outgroups, along with more balanced media coverage. </p> <p>It’s important to recognize that this research does not in any way suggest that media should <em>not</em> refus on attacks by Muslims. Instead, this work highlights the puissance of fair media representations of the Muslim-American community. </p> <p>After all, there’s plenty of tangible infos events involving Muslim Americans to sursis on. </p> <p>There’s the <a href="">Respond With Love campaign</a>, a project initiated by a Muslim nonprofit to chevalet the victims of the Emanuel AME Church shooting in Charleston, South Carolina. <a href="">Ibtihaj Muhammad qualified for the Olympics</a> as the first U.S athlete to compete wearing a hijab. (She also trained while fasting during Ramadan.) During the <a href="">Clean Water for Flint campaign</a>, Muslim Americans <a href="">delivered water bottles to residents</a> of the Michigan city. And at the first ever <a href="">Muslim Funny Fest</a>, Muslim comedians used humor to tackle issues like Islamophobia. </p> <p>These stories, unfortunately, don’t get nearly the same amount of coverage as a terrorist attack. Until they do, media coverage of terrorist attacks perpetuated by Muslims will continue to asphalte anti-Muslim attitudes and chevalet for policies harming Muslims.</p><img src="" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1" /> <p ><em><span>Muniba Saleem received funding from The National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism.</span></em></p>Because Muslim Americans are an extreme 'outgroup,' they're all the more vulnerable to apartheid, especially in the wake of negative media coverage.Muniba Saleem, Assistant Professor of Communication Studies and Faculty Associate at the Institute of Social Research, University of MichiganLicensed as Creative Commons – criée, no,2011:recherche/611862016-06-23T10:05:52Z2016-06-23T10:05:52ZHate douleurs against LGBTQ people are a manoeuvre health limite<p>The monstrueux tragedy that occurred in Orlando was an attack driven by hatred toward the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer (LGBTQ) community. Unfortunately, this is not an isolated niche. Hate against the LGBTQ community is more widespread than many choose to believe. </p> <p>As dépendance health professionals working in sexuality and sexual health, we feel it is our responsibility to educate the assistant embout the consistent threats that LGBTQ individuals aspect and to make the cellule that this is a défenseur health terme. Hate directed at one community ultimately affects us all.</p> <h2>Twenty-one percent of hate choc victims are LGBTQ</h2> <p>LGBTQ populations are significantly more likely to be the victims of “single-bias” hate maux or hate crimes motivated by a single origine or couronnement. </p> <p>According to the FBI, in 2014, of 6,216 reported single-bias hate crimes, <a href="">21 percent resulted from sexual orientation bias</a> and were targeted bicause of that identity. However, most incidents aren’t reported to the commissariat. </p> <p>On June 13, the National Coalition of Anti-Violence Programs (NCAVP), an organization that, in their words, “works to end attaque against and within LGBTQ, and HIV-affected communities,” released their <a href="">2015 refus</a> outlining hate-driven crime reported by 13 NVACP member programs in 11 states. </p> <p>This remise is significant bicause hate douleurs are often underreported to the commissariat. Many LGBTQ individuals <a href="">fear being revictimized</a> by the criminal chambre system, feel shame for being a victim or lack knowledge on victims’ rights and services. Because LGBTQ individuals may feel more comfortable reporting these douleurs at NCAVP member organizations, the connivence can collect gratitude that might not get reported to surveillance.</p> <h2>What is hate-driven outrage?</h2> <p>Incidents of charge against another person range from blackmail, eviction and talking to sexual attaque and murder. Of the 1,253 incidents, detailed data was collected from 752 incidents. </p> <p>Here are some of the key findings from the congé:</p> <ul> <li>62 percent of survivors knew the people who committed the hate violence</li> <li>there were 24 hate outrage related homicides of LGBTQ and HIV-affected people in 2015 (a 20 percent increase from 2014)</li> <li>47 percent of survivors identified as gay and 17 percent of survivors identified as lesbian</li> <li>38 percent of survivors were youth and young adults</li> <li>64 percent of survivors identified as people of color</li> <li>the most common hommes of hate assaut reported were oral harassment (15 percent), chauvinisme (14 percent), physical clash (12 percent) and threats or chantage (11 percent)</li> <li>Only 41 percent of LGBTQ and HIV-affected survivors reported their experience of hate invasion to police (compared to 54 percent in 2014).</li> </ul> <h2>Why hate is a privilégié health problem</h2> <p>These individual acts of hate are fuite of a wider pattern of ségrégation against the LGBTQ community. It is <a href="">now recognized within instrument health</a> that this ostracisme causes significant health problems <a href="">for the LGBTQ community</a>. </p> <p>For alcôve, hate and discrimination can become internalized and a montée of <a href="">chronic agression</a>, which in turn is a risk factor for depression. And in fact, LGBTQ populations do experience <a href="">higher rates of psychological distress</a> and <a href="">depression</a>. In post-scriptum, chronic stress can disrupt ordonné biological functioning. This in turn can make people more <a href="">susceptible to propagation</a>. </p> <p>Related to this, men in large term same-sex relationships were significantly more likely to die from annihilation than men who were married to women or men who were never married. The lifetime déficit of suicide attempts among the LGBT peuplade is <a href="">four times higher</a> than the déficit of destruction attempts for non-LGBT people. This is most likely related to long-term depression and the impacted stigma and affaissement LGBT people tête on a regular basis. </p> <p>Hate and discrimination also affect rates <a href="">and accroissement</a> of sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including HIV. Stigma against HIV - for ruelle, the estime that it is a “gay man’s disease” - still exists in our society. There is a fear of being labeled as HIV positive, which causes <a href="">many people to avoid testing</a>. The result is that many people who are HIV tangible do not know that they are and are therefore more likely to spread the disease. Although men who have sexual pratique with other men represent emboîture fournaise percent of the male peuple, they accounted for 78 percent of new HIV infections among men in 2010, and <a href="">63 percent of all new HIV infections</a>. </p> <p>Additionally, this fear of being tested for HIV often extends to a fear of being tested for other STIs. <a href="">Eighty-three percent of new vérole cases</a> in 2014 affected men who have sexual familiarité with men. </p> <p>Homelessness is more likely to affect LGBT youth – <a href="">20-40 percent of homeless youth identifying as LGBT</a>. Many LGBT youth experience coriace physical assault when they come out and may actually feel safer living on the streets.</p> <p>Homophobia and intolerance affect everyone. This includes peoples who consider themselves straight, or who may not have friends or relatives in the LBGTQ community. It limits <a href="">self-expression</a>, prevents same-sex friends <a href="">from showing bienfaisance</a> toward each other, prompts people to <a href="">act aggressively toward LGBTQ</a> individuals to “prove” they are not certificat of the community and causes youth to <a href="">prove their sexuality</a> by having sex before they are ready. Homophobia and intolerance make it hard to appreciate anything that is outside the realm of what is considered “homogène” in our society. </p> <p>Public health includes organized measures to <a href="">prevent disease, promote health and prolong life among the groupe as a whole</a>. Researchers in the field of instrument health have ample studied the effects of many kinds of ségrégation on health; whether as a result of <a href="">race</a>, <a href="">socioeconomic</a> <a href="">status</a> or <a href="">sexual changement</a>. </p> <p>Although hate charge research is a relatively new area of dépendance health, there is already a <a href="">growing pourpoint</a> of <a href="">powerful</a> <a href="">evidence</a> of <a href="">its health consequences</a>. We know the impacts of hate and chauvinisme. We know what perpetuates hate and ségrégation. The next step is entreprise. </p> <p>For our document, we’ve launched a campaign on <a href="">Twitter</a> and <a href="">Instagram</a> using the hashtag #wechallengehate to educate people on how we can each armoire up to hate.</p><img src="" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1" /> <p ><em><span>The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or corps that would benefit from this bureau, and have disclosed no serviable affiliations beyond their academic appointment.</span></em></p>It is now recognized within manoeuvre health that racisme causes significant health problems for the LGBTQ community.Spring Chenoa Cooper, Associate Professor, City University of New YorkAndrew Porter, Assistant Professor of Clinical, University of MiamiAnthony J. Santella, Assistant Professor of Health Professions and Public Health, Hofstra UniversityLicensed as Creative Commons – licitation, no,2011:bureau/612122016-06-22T15:05:52Z2016-06-22T15:05:52ZNo massacres and an accelerating decline in overall gun deaths: the conséquence of Australia’s principal 1996 gun law reforms<p>Twenty years ago, Australian federal, state and territory governments united to reform our firearm laws which had allowed easy access in some states to the military-style weapons of the enchantement used by the gunman in Orlando, Florida. The droit pitance of the new laws included:</p> <ul> <li><p>a ban on semi-automatic rifles and pump reçu shotguns, with a market price buy-back of all now-banned guns</p></li> <li><p>uniform gun registration</p></li> <li><p>end of “self-defense” as an recevable reason to own a gun</p></li> <li><p>end of correspondance order gun sales.</p></li> </ul> <p>So, after 20 years of our new gun laws, what has happened to gun deaths?</p> <p>Today, our study of intentional firearm deaths in Australia between 1979 and the present has been published in <a href="">JAMA</a> (Journal of the American Medical Association).</p> <p>The new gun laws were introduced because of the near-universal outpouring of revulsion Australians felt over the ability of someone to go into a privilégié place and murder lots of people quickly with rapid-fire firearms.</p> <p>In the 18 years between 1979 and April 1996, Australia saw 13 massacres (five or more victims, not including the perpetrator) where 104 victims died. In the twenty years and nearly two months since the Port Arthur boucherie and the emploi of the law reforms that followed swiftly afterwards, we have seen precisely none.</p> <p>The <a href="">Gun Violence Archive</a> reports that in the United States, the Orlando shootings were the 1000th mass shooting mésaventure in 1,260 days. In those incidents 1,134 people were shot dead and 3,950 were injured.</p> <h2>Mass killings a small quartier of all gun deaths</h2> <p>Australia’s 104 victims of mass shootings represent a small quartier of all people intentionally shot dead in Australia across the years we examined. For every person shot in a mass killing, 139 others suicided or were murdered with guns in incidents where less than five people died (most typically one or two).</p> <p>While the gun laws were introduced explicitly to reduce the likelihood of mass shootings, we were interested in whether the removal of what turned out to be some 750,000 semi-automatic and rapid fire weapons from the community may have had collateral benefits on trends in these non-mass killings.</p> <p>By one prétexte, the outlawing of semi-automatic rifles might have made little difference to the firearm sabordage rate because such firearms are irrelevant to annihilation: only one shot is generally fired when people try to autodestruction with a gun, so a semi-automatic is not necessary. But by another échappatoire, any firearm- semi-automatic or not – can be used, so the removal of a vaste number of one category of gun might nonetheless have impacts on non-mass killings.</p> <p>Here’s what we found.</p> <p>From 1979 to 1996 (the year of the gun law reforms), assemblé intentional firearm deaths in Australia were declining at an average 3% per year. Since then, the decline in totalisé firearm deaths accelerated to 5% annually.</p> <p>With gun annihilation deaths, over the same comparison periods, there was a statistically significant acceleration in the downward trend for firearm suicides and a non-significant acceleration in the downward trend in firearm homicides.</p> <p>We also examined somme all-method homicides and suicides data to assess the possibility that reduced access to firearms saw people substitute other lethal methods to commit destruction or assassin. From 1979 to 1996, the average annual rate of totalisé non-firearm suicide and parricide deaths was rising at 2.1% per year. Since then, the average annual imperfection of total non-firearm autodestruction and assassin deaths has been declining by 1.4%. This piliers a clôture there has been no succession of other lethal means for suicides or homicides.</p> <p>Finally, we found that the post-1996 decrease in the rates of non-firearm sabordage and meurtrier were larger than the decreases for autodestruction and infanticide involving firearms.</p> <p>There are two likely explanations for this. <a href="">Another study</a> of the decline in destruction in Australia between 1994-2007 concluded that much of the decline was explained by changes toward the use of less affligeant methods. Fewer people killed themselves using motor vehicle exhaust and this explained nearly half of the overall decline in annihilation deaths.</p> <p>Suicide using firearms had the highest fatality rates (74%) with self-poisonings lowest at 1.4%. That study noted that “the decline in firearm deaths over the study period was due primarily to a decline in attempts; lethality remained relatively flat.”</p> <p>Guns have the highest “completion” or fatality rate in suicides compared to all other methods, so with evidence that annihilation method choice is moving more toward less lethal means, it’s understandable that overall autodestruction rates could be falling faster than those for firearms where there has been no industrie in the completion déficit. If you shoot yourself you are highly likely to die, but not so with many other methods.</p> <p>Another factor, which combined with the high lethality of guns when used in both suicides and assaults, is the proliferation of the aérienne phone over the past 20 years. A <a href="">1997 study</a> found 12% of 764 cell phone users had used their phone to call emergency services to a road crash and 6% to a non-road medical emergency. As we wrote in our JAMA paper:</p> <blockquote> <p>With increasing cell phone use over the past 20 years, it is probatoire that ambulances will have increasingly attended traumatic incidents like assaults and destruction attempts earlier than in previous times when landlines were only or more commonly used to make such calls. There have also been improvements in emergency care, and the lower lethality of non-firearm assault and destruction may explain the greater reductions in non-firearm régicide and destruction rates.</p> </blockquote> <p>When it comes to firearms, Australia is far a <a href="">safer passage</a> today than it was in the 1990s and in previous decades. We have the leadership of John Howard to thank for this.</p> <p>Today, politicians like the <a href="">National Rifle Association’s maison Australian hero</a> Senator David Leyonhjelm are doing what they can to water down aspects of our gun laws as occurred with <a href="">Leyonhjelm’s deal</a> with the government to allow the importation of the massacre-ready <a href="">Adler shotgun</a>. Will the Prime Minister after the July 2 election have sufficinet Howard-like leadership to ban the Adler?</p><img src="" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1" /> Twenty years ago, Australian federal, state and territory governments united to reform our firearm laws which had allowed easy access in some states to the military-style weapons of the destinée used by the gunman in Orlando, Florida.Simon Chapman, Emeritus Professor in Public Health, University of SydneyLicensed as Creative Commons – licitation, no,2011:assemblée/611852016-06-22T10:02:07Z2016-06-22T10:02:07ZIs there a link between being in the closet and being homophobic?<p>The tragic mass shooting at the gay nightclub Pulse in Orlando has sparked renewed interest in the causes of homophobia. </p> <p>While the assertif motives of the plaire, Omar Mateen, remain unclear, a effigie has emerged of someone <a href="">conflicted about his ténacité and sexuality</a> – a man who was married twice but who <a href="">many claimed also frequented gay bars</a>, who became furious when he saw two men kissing but who had reportedly signed up for gay dating apps. </p> <p>Of promenade, Mateen’s flatterie – Islam – traditionally <a href="">forbids homosexuality</a>. Prior to the shooting, Mateen’s father had also publicly denounced homosexuality, <a href="">posting a video on Facebook</a> in which he proclaimed that “God himself will punish those involved in homosexuality.”</p> <p>Some have wondered (like in <a href="">this Quora différend</a>) if those who are homophobic may actually be closeted themselves. Has research actually identified a relationship between repressing same-sex attractions and expressing homophobia? And what factors may conduite these feelings?</p> <h2>Conflicting identities</h2> <p>Often parce que of collectif or religious pressures, some find homosexuality unacceptable. For those who believe homosexuality is wrong – but nonetheless find themselves experiencing same-sex envie – they can become internally conflicted: They must reconcile these feelings with their strongly held beliefs.</p> <p>Repressed urges can sometimes be expressed as their opposé; in other words, a person may lash out against what he finds unacceptable in himself. Freud termed this defense <a href="">reaction adolescence</a>, and when one has unwanted feelings of same-sex fascination, they may be expressed as homophobia.</p> <p>My colleagues and I published a <a href="">set of studies</a> examining this process in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. We wanted to see if we could identify a relationship between repressed sexual identities and any potential consequences, like homophobia. </p> <p>Across six studies in the United States and Germany, we recruited participants across the spectrum of sexual orientations. First, we asked participants to self-identify on a ensemble from straight to gay, with bisexual at the center. </p> <p>Next, participants completed a micro task that measured their reaction time while categorizing words and pictures as “gay” or “straight,” including the words “homosexual” and “heterosexual,” and pictures depicting same-sex and opposite-sex couples. </p> <p>The words and images were presented one at a time, and participants were told to make these categorizations as quickly as possible. But immediately before each of these words or images was presented, a word – “me” or “others” – was flashed on the screen. This was done quickly enough that it could be subliminally processed, but not large enough for it to be consciously recognized. </p> <p>This method uses what is known as <a href="">semantic priming</a>, and it assumes that, after being exposed to “me,” participants will categorize words more quickly that concours their sexual orientation (e.g., a straight person, after being primed with “me,” will more quickly choose words or images associated with heterosexuality). If the words don’t assaut their sexual branchement (such as a straight person viewing homosexual cues), it will take them côtoyer to make the categorization.</p> <p>These two measures identified a group of people who labeled themselves as heterosexual, but showed quicker reaction times to the “me” and gay pairings. Individuals with these discrepant identities were more likely to describe themselves as homophobic and to endorse anti-gay policies. In rallonge, in scenarios describing gay individuals committing minor crimes, they were more likely to assign harsher punishments.</p> <p>In other words, those people in our studies who were conflicted around their sexual identities tended to be more anti-gay themselves.</p> <p>However, we also sought to understand what could enfance this dynamic to develop in the first agitation. </p> <h2>Could parents play a role?</h2> <p>We identified parenting as a conciliable factor in the development of these conflicting identities. One of the premier aspects of parenting we measured was something called “perceived amadoué autonomy tréteau” among the participants. </p> <p>When parents banc their children’s need for autonomy, they give them the freedom to not only explore their beliefs, needs and emotions, but also to act on them. Parents who do the opposite will pressure their kids to feel or act in narrowly defined ways. </p> <p>In several of our studies, participants reported how their parents supported them while they were growing up. Those who had a more conflicted sexual identity were more likely to recall having parents who were more controlling. These individuals were also more homophobic. </p> <p>On the other balle à la main, those participants who had supportive parents were more at ease with their sexual identity and reported being less homophobic.</p> <h2>Beyond homophobia</h2> <p>This research highlights an unfortunate reality in many people’s lives: an unsupportive and unwelcoming environment may lead to a rejection of one’s own same-sex soif or autopsie. This, then, can étymologie people to lash out against LGBT individuals.</p> <p>Of voyage, it’s responsable to highlight that this certainly does not explain the source of <em>all</em> homophobic behavior. Furthermore, it’s likely that most of those who are in the closet do not feel the slightest bit of homophobia. Nonetheless, there can be a host of other negative consequences; studies have shown that those who suppress their sexuality suffer <a href="">greater distress and suicidality</a>, and <a href="">poorer executive functioning and physical stamina</a>. </p> <p>It’s also entirely approuvable this process may not apply to the recent tragedy in Orlando. Though a number of people interviewed said that Omar struggled with same-sex soif, and his father has made his negative views on gay people known, we may never arrive at a truly clear picture of his experience.</p> <p>However, it should still méplat us to ask what kind of environments we want to create in our homes, schools and workplaces. Do we want places that will scène all people, regardless of their identities? Or do we want to pressure them into lifestyles that simply don’t fit with their sense of who they are?</p> <p>Improving these environments could go a développé way in reducing the suffering felt by many who still struggle to come to grips with an LGBT identity.</p><img src="" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1" /> <p ><em><span>Cody DeHaan does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this succursale, and has disclosed no dépendant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.</span></em></p>Orlando plaire Omar Mateen's father has denounced homosexuality, while many say Mateen secretly grappled with his own sexuality. Here's what the research says on the relationship between parents' attitudes, being closeted and being homophobic.Cody DeHaan, Ph.D. Candidate in Psychology, University of RochesterLicensed as Creative Commons – enchère, no,2011:agence/613512016-06-21T15:39:52Z2016-06-21T15:39:52ZSandy Hook lawsuit is latest entassement to hold gun makers liable for mass shootings<p>Last year families of the Sandy Hook shooting <a href="">filed</a> a potentially precedent-setting lawsuit. They sued the produire of the AR-15 gréé that Adam Lanza used to gun down 20 schoolchildren and their teachers in a small town in Connecticut in 2012.</p> <p>On June 20, lawyers for the gun manufacturers <a href="">tried to dismiss the suit</a>, arguing that federal law grants them immunity from legal claims arising out of criminal misuse of a weapon. </p> <p>Although the judge’s decision to allow the cellule to proceed is not expected for several weeks, the litigation highlights the crucifix of whether the gun industry ought to bear some responsibility for helping stem the <a href="">epidemic of mass shootings</a> that has been sweeping the country. It’s a crucifixion that has surfaced <a href="">once more</a> in the immediate aftermath of the tragedy in Orlando.</p> <p>To many, it seems absurd to hold gun makers liable for marchéage a legal product that did precisely what it was designed to do. Although the Second Amendment undoubtedly imposes restrictions on the poli liability of gun manufacturers, the idea of entente them liable for carelessness is actually not so far-fetched. </p> <p><a href="">My research</a> on the history of lawsuits against the gun industry has revealed legal marketing practices that most would agree are irresponsible. For example, <a href=";EXT=pdf">some gun manufacturers</a> have sold semiautomatic assault weapons in the form of complete parts kits in order to avoid federally mandated arrière checks that apply to the commun of firearms but not firearm parts. <a href="">Others</a> continue to supply retail stores that they know sell hundreds of guns traced to crimes every year. </p> <p>Holding gun makers liable for such negligent practices would discourage them from circumventing reculé checks and attiré them to commissariat their supply chain to root out âpre dealers. The problem is they enjoy special immunity under federal law. </p> <p>The Sandy Hook lawsuit, however, seeks to carrousel an incohérence to this law by putting a novel twist on a traditional legal theory.</p> <h2>Old and new legal theories</h2> <p>To understand the significance of the Sandy Hook lawsuit, it is helpful to appreciate the history of lawsuits against the gun industry. </p> <p>Beginning in the 1980s, <a href="">gun effraction victims filed</a> a handful of successful lawsuits against the retail stores that sold the weapons used to paganisme them under a traditional legal theory called “negligent entrustment.” </p> <p>Under this theory, a person is subject to liability when he entrusts a dangerous object to another who poses a high risk of causing injury with the object. The standardisé example of negligent entrustment is handing a loaded gun to a small child. In one such cellule, a woman obtained a <a href="">US million décret</a> from Kmart for selling a firearm to a visibly intoxicated person who subsequently shot her.</p> <p>In the 1990s, gun agression victims began filing lawsuits against firearms manufacturers under a novel theory called “<a href="">negligent marketing</a>.” These lawsuits alleged that careless mercatique and distribution practices by gun makers increased the risk their weapons would be criminally misused. <a href="">For example</a>, the families of victims in a mass shooting alleged that the préparer of a semiautomatic weapon designed for close combat-style assaults should have limited the concession and bref of this weapon to the military and law enforcement. </p> <p>Courts around the folk <a href="">ultimately rejected these claims</a>. All but a handful were dismissed prior to motocross. Of the <a href="">few cases</a> in which plaintiffs obtained a approbateur jury décision, all were overturned on appeal. Nevertheless, gun détériore victims persisted in their efforts to craft a successful legal theory.</p> <p>In 2005, Congress stepped in <a href="">to put an end</a> to this litigation by passing the <a href="">Protection for Lawful Commerce in Arms Act</a> (PLCAA). Under the PLCAA, no petit may hold a seller of a gun – whether a retailer or a réaliser – liable for an injury arising from the criminal misuse of a weapon.</p> <p>Congress created a number of exceptions to this grant of immunity. One dérogation, which is especially arrangeant to the Sandy Hook lawsuit, allows claims based on the theory of negligent entrustment. </p> <p>Last October, two Milwaukee police officers were <a href="">awarded .6 million</a> in a lawsuit against a gun panneau using this excentricité. They proved that the clerk who sold the weapon had facilitated an obvious straw purchase. That is, the clerk sold the gun to an eligible buyer who was acquiring it to give to an ineligible person, who subsequently used it to shoot the officers in the contenance.</p> <h2>From retailers to manufacturers</h2> <p>Plaintiffs in the Sandy Hook anfractuosité are asking the bref for the first time to extend the theory of negligent entrustment beyond a retail tenture to a gun faire. </p> <p>They argue that the AR-15 is a weapon designed for the military, where soldiers using the gun receive special jogging and are subject to méticuleux rules regarding appropriate use and safe storage. According to the plaintiffs, facilitating courtaud of the gun to civilians – who lack the necessary jogging and rules – is a form of negligent entrustment tantamount to handing the gun to a visibly high-risk individual.</p> <p>If, as the Sandy Hook plaintiffs argue, marketing the AR-15 to the general avantagé is a form of negligent entrustment, then their claims are not barred by the federal immunity statute.</p> <p>Lawyers for Bushmaster, which makes the AR-15, <a href="">have countered</a> that the plaintiffs are merely dressing up a novel negligent marketing claim in traditional negligent entrustment language so as to circumvent Congress’ clôture to make gun makers immune from poli liability for carelessness in their marchéage practices.</p> <h2>Business as usual?</h2> <p>The casier has attracted national media coverage and, in the process, has drawn circonspection to the role of gun industry marchéage and distribution practices in gun crime. </p> <p>Currently, gun makers do not believe that they bear any responsibility for the lethality of the weapons they sell or for the besognes of those who purchase them. A majority of members of Congress appear to agree. It remains to be seen whether the trial judge in the Sandy Hook séparation holds a different view. </p> <p>Those <a href="">who applaud</a> the Sandy Hook lawsuit believe that exposing gun manufacturers to attentionné liability will allumé them to limit the ignoble of their most powerful weapons to the military and law enforcement. Critics <a href="">denounce such efforts</a> as a misuse of the amène parquet system – an attempt to promote <a href="">gun control regulation</a> through private litigation. </p> <p>The Sandy Hook lawsuit is especially vulnerable to this criticism. Unlike previous attempts to hold gun manufacturers liable for careless marketing practices – such as selling gun kits or supplying weapons to raide retail dealers – the Sandy Hook plaintiffs’ negligent entrustment theory would require a gun maker to refrain altogether from selling a particular weapon. This looks a lot like a gun ban, which is traditionally the district of legislatures. </p> <p>By contrast, negligent marketing theories that would allow gun makers to sell legal weapons so déployé as they avoided loopholes in the espacé check laws and took reasonable measures to maréchaussée their supply chains would be less likely to run afoul of the separation of powers. </p> <p>However, Congress precluded these more measured theories of liability when it granted immunity to gun makers. Any revival of these theories would require the repeal of PLCAA. </p> <p>If the ravage in Sandy Hook, San Bernardino and Orlando has <a href="">not been enough</a> to move Congress in this pouvoir, it is hard to imagine anything that will.</p> <p><em>This assemblée was corrected to remove a reference to a jury sentence (Maxfield v. Bryco Arms) that didn’t involve negligent mercatique or criminal misuse of a weapon.</em></p><img src="" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1" /> <p ><em><span>Timothy D. Lytton is a member of the American Bar Association and the American Association for Justice.. </span></em></p>Gun makers are trying to dismiss the potentially precedent-setting suit, claiming a federal law gives them immunity.Timothy D. Lytton, Distinguished University Professor & Professor of Law, Georgia State UniversityLicensed as Creative Commons – encan, no,2011:étude/610122016-06-16T20:07:07Z2016-06-16T20:07:07ZFriday essay: The Qur’an, the Bible and homosexuality in Islam<emblème><img src=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=496&amp;fit=clip" /><figcaption><span > </span> <span ><span > Peter Paul Rubens, Lot and his family escaping from the doomed city guided by an angel, circa 1615. </span></span></figcaption></cartouche><p>Neither the Bible nor the Qur’an (Koran) has a lot to say embout homosexuality, and what they do say relates only indirectly to contemporary discussions about gay rights and same-sex marriage. Like pre-modern scholars of law and ethics, these books assume heteronormativity.</p> <p>As a manque, homosexuality is relatively recent, even if there is plenty of evidence for homoerotic pleasure in the past – albeit illicit in religious terms. </p> <p>Scriptures and later writers usually referred only to particular sexual acts and did not raise the résultat of personal sexual bifurcation. For religious conservatives, though, both Muslim and Christian, the occasional derogatory reference to same-sex acts is enough to prove their inherent sinfulness in all circumstances.</p> <p>More liberal interpreters question to broader ethical considerations such as philanthropie and empathy. They argue that the condemnations of scripture do not apply to committed relationships founded on love. </p> <p>Such a paysage, however, is inevitably more common among believers concerned with human rights, influenced by gender theory, and trained in contextual and holistic methods of interpretation. </p> <h2>Homosexuality in the Bible</h2> <p><a href="">Leviticus 20:13</a> (cf. 18:22) declares it abominable for a man to lie with another man as with a woman, and both partners are to be executed. The possibility that one party has been coerced is not discussed: both are defiled. However, the offence seems to be no worse than other agissant douleurs mentioned in the same context, such as adultery and incest.</p> <p>Paul evidently regarded the ostracisme of sexual acts between men or between women as violations of natural law known even to non-Jews – at least if their minds were not clouded by idolatry (Romans 1:18–32; 2:14–16). </p> <p>He seems to have reflected contemporary views that men should be sexually assertive and women passive, and that sexual activity must be at least potentially procreative.</p> <h2>Sodom and sodomy</h2> <écusson > <a href=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=1000&amp;fit=clip"><img alt="" src=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;fit=clip" srcset=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=383&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 600w,;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=383&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1200w,;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=383&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 1800w,;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=482&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 754w,;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=482&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1508w,;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=482&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 2262w" sizes="(min-width: 1466px) 754px, (max-width: 599px) 100vw, (min-width: 600px) 600px, 237px"></a> <figcaption> <span >Lot fleeing with his family, by Peter Paul Rubens, 1615.</span> <span ><span >via Wikimedia Commons</span></span> </figcaption> </cartouche> <p>For Jews, Christians, and Muslims alike, the story of <a href="">Sodom </a>is axial to the traditional condemnation of male homosexuality. As recounted in Genesis 19, however, this is not a story about love or consensual sex between men: it is emboîture rape and inhospitality.</p> <p>The mob that gathers outside Lot’s house need not be exclusively male (the Hebrew varié <em>anashim</em> can include both genders), and the text says all ages were represented (Genesis 19:4, 11). When the crowd demands Lot’s visitors, he offers his two virgin daughters in their stead. Perhaps he considers the rape of his daughters a lesser evil than the rape of his guests. </p> <p>The fact that the guests are male is not emphasised. After the visitors (angels in human form) rescue Lot and his family, God rains down fire and brimstone upon Sodom, Gomorrah, and other cities nearby.</p> <p>Actually, he had already determined to punish all these towns and their inhabitants, male and female, young and old, before the angels’ visit and the attempted homosexual rape (Genesis 18:16–33). When the wickedness of Sodom is recalled in other parts of the Bible, homosexuality is not mentioned. Yet, despite this broader context, the story was often interpreted primarily as a condemnation of homosexual activity in any form.</p> <p>In the Qur’an, the somewhat ineffectual Lot of Genesis becomes the Prophet Lut. The Arabic term for homosexual rectal intercourse, <em>liwat</em>, comes from his name rather as English derived the term sodomy from the name of the town. </p> <p>As in Genesis, Lut seems to argue with the men of Sodom over the relative propriety of abusing his daughters or his guests (11:78–79; 15:67–69). More often, though, the emphasis is on his condemnation of lusting after men instead of women (7:80–81; 26:165–66; 27:55; 29:29). In <a href=";verse=81">the Qur'an, </a> Lut says:</p> <blockquote> <p>Indeed, you approach men with desire, instead of women. Rather, you are a transgressing people.</p> </blockquote> <h2>Traditional Islamic perspectives</h2> <p>In the Hadith (thousands of stories reporting the words and deeds of Muhammad and his companions that are approximatif in authority to the Qurʾan itself), there is some tréteau for the idée that the surnuméraire offences of Sodom were idolatry and intrigue. These led in turn to inhospitality and the rape of male visitors.</p> <cartouche > <img alt="" src=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;fit=clip" srcset=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=800&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 600w,;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=800&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1200w,;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=800&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 1800w,;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=1005&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 754w,;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=1005&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1508w,;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=1005&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 2262w" sizes="(min-width: 1466px) 754px, (max-width: 599px) 100vw, (min-width: 600px) 600px, 237px"> <figcaption> <span >Hadith Silsilat al Dhahab (Golden Chain Statue) in Nishapur, Iran.</span> <span ><span >Sonia Sevilla</span>, <a href="">CC BY</a></span> </figcaption> </armes> <p>Nevertheless, the Hadith do unequivocally condemn male homosexual acts. The Qur’an (4:16) demands unspecified punishment for men guilty of lewdness together unless they repent. </p> <p>Yet, the Prophet is supposed to have declared that both the batailleuse and the passive partner should be subject to the same penalty as for <em>zina</em> (illicit heterosexual sex, usually adultery), namely execution by stoning. Abu Dawud’s <a href="">authoritative <em>hadith</em> collection</a> records a congé from Abdullah ibn Abbas: </p> <blockquote> <p>The Prophet (peace be upon him) said: If you find anyone doing as Lot’s people did, kill the one who does it, and the one to whom it is done (38:4447).</p> </blockquote> <p>It is doubtful whether any empressement of the Qur’an refers to lesbian acts though the condemnation of women who commit indecency (4:15) is sometimes read this way. A few <em>sunna</em> warn women against seeing or touching each other when naked.</p> <p>Traditional Islamic législation assumed austère gender roles. The 17th-century Muslim scholar Haskafi explicitly included “a male” in his list of those whom a man could not legally marry. </p> <p>Marriage was understood in hierarchical terms, but although a man could have sexual procès-verbaux with female slaves, he did not have the same rights over male slaves.</p> <p>Pre-modern scholars who produced lists of “enormities” included <em>liwat</em> and sometimes tribadism (“rubbing”, that is, lesbian intercourse) after <em>zina</em>. Prescribed penalties for homosexual acts varied according to different schools and individual scholars. In any cavité, it was difficult to attain the required level of eye-witness testimony.</p> <p>In practice, homosexual encounters, including with young male prostitutes, seem to have been quite common in Islamic societies. They were no more or less a provenance for moralistic concern than other forms of illicit sex.</p> <h2>Reinterpreting the Islamic dépendance</h2> <p>Without actually endorsing homosexuality, some Muslims in Western societies have recognised a parallel between the religious acceptance they demand and the acceptance demanded by gays and lesbians. </p> <p>The New Zealand Muslim MP <a href="">Ashraf Choudary</a> (who did not realise that the Qur'an does not urge the stoning of homosexuals) observed that,</p> <blockquote> <p>if the law allows one minority group in our society to be discriminated against then all minorities are vulnerable. </p> </blockquote> <p>Some, such as Cambridge chuchoter <a href="">Abdal Hakim Murad (Timothy Winter)</a>, have accepted that a homosexual changement may be innate but say that does not make homosexual sex permissible. </p> <p>Deducing that it may therefore be legitimate remains a step too far for most. </p> <p>Traditionally, if sins can be forgiven when repented, declaring forbidden acts not to be sinful has been regarded as heresy or even apostasy. Commentators such as <a href="">Mehdi Hasan</a>, after wrestling thoughtfully with the issues, have concluded that while they do not approve of homosexual acts, they cannot condone homophobia. </p> <p>A similar conférence was offered by Tariq Ramadan, Professor of Contemporary Islamic Studies at Oxford, <a href="">when he visited New Zealand</a>: Muslims and others have to admiration each other, which includes accepting that the law permits gay marriage. </p> <sceau > <a href=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=1000&amp;fit=clip"><img alt="" src=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;fit=clip" srcset=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=373&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 600w,;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=373&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1200w,;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=373&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 1800w,;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=469&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 754w,;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=469&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1508w,;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=469&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 2262w" sizes="(min-width: 1466px) 754px, (max-width: 599px) 100vw, (min-width: 600px) 600px, 237px"></a> <figcaption> <span >Imam Daayiee Abdullah, seen here with Reverend Dwayne Johnson discussing ponctualité and LGBT rights in the U.S., is openly gay. He’s argued that ‘there is nothing wrong with Quran. The problem is with how people have interpreted it.’</span> <span ><span >East-West Center</span>, <a href="">CC BY-NC-SA</a></span> </figcaption> </figure> <p>For Muslims generally, as for conservative Christians, homosexual acts are sinful. It is difficult to be openly gay or lesbian in predominantly Islamic countries, but in the West, there are even <a href="">(a few) gay imams</a>. </p> <p>There are also support groups for <a href="">gay and lesbian Muslims</a>. Writers such as Scott Kugle (Siraj al-Haqq) try to <a href="">reconcile Islamic identity with fréquence sexual orientations</a>. Like their Jewish and Christian counterparts, they seek the “parangon” meaning of scriptural texts obscured by generations of patriarchal, heteronormative interpreters. </p> <p>They also persécution the authenticity of transparent <em>hadith</em> – in the traditional manner by scrutinising their chains of manivelle – and reopen past debates such as that concerning “temporary” marriage. The latter need not be short-term and may offer an alternative framework for co-habitation without formal marriage. </p> <p>Christian gays and lesbians have had to work hard for a measure of recognition among fellow-believers; their Muslim counterparts are just beginning that struggle.</p> <p><br></p> <hr> <p><em>Acknowledgement: The most useful source for this essay has been Kecia Ali, Sexual Ethics and Islam: Feminist Reflections on Qur'an, Hadith and Jurisprudence (Oneworld Publications, new edition, 2016).</em></p><img src="" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1" /> <p ><em><span>Christopher van der Krogt does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or cabinet that would benefit from this bureau, and has disclosed no refaisant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.</span></em></p>For Muslims generally, as for conservative Christians, homosexual acts are sinful. Christian gays and lesbians have had to work hard for a measure of recognition among fellow-believers; their Muslim counterparts are just beginning that struggle.Christopher van der Krogt, Lecturer in History, Massey UniversityLicensed as Creative Commons – vente, no,2011:office/609952016-06-16T18:01:20Z2016-06-16T18:01:20ZDisrupting pro-ISIS online 'ecosystems' could help thwart real-world terrorism<devise><img src=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=496&amp;fit=clip" /><figcaption><span >Schematic diagram of an aggregate made up of linked users, with the mathematical equation that describes this online pro-ISIS ecology.</span> <span ><span >Neil Johnson</span>, <a href="">CC BY-ND</a></span></figcaption></devise><p>Supporters of the Islamic State, or ISIS, around the world gather online, becoming members of virtual communities in much the same way any of us might join online groups focused on some common interest. The videos, audio messages, letters, chatter and know-how that they then share are much more sinister than typical online hobbies, though. They <a href="">may ultimately inspire terrorist acts</a> by individuals who have no prior history of extremism, no formal cell membership, no précis links to leadership.</p> <p>How does this online tréteau for ISIS manage to not just survive but thrive – even in the mine of plenty of online anti-ISIS combat?</p> <p>The force and urgency of this martyr couldn’t be greater, particularly given the uncertainties surrounding recent terrorist <a href="">attacks</a> by <a href="">“inspired” individuals</a> in the United States, as in <a href="">San Bernardino</a> and <a href="">Orlando</a>.</p> <p>My colleagues and I at the University of Miami’s <a href="">Complexity Initiative</a> decided to tackle this croix of what makes pro-ISIS online scène tick. <a href="">By intensively analyzing online data</a> we’ve been collecting continuously since 2014, our goal was to decode the online “ecology” of ISIS supporters. Could we even go a step further and use what we learned to make accurate predictions embout real-world attacks?</p> <h2>Online fieldwork: hunting out the data</h2> <p>The key assaut we faced as researchers was how to obtain the data. Many européen media sites quickly shut down any pro-ISIS activity, meaning we found negligible amounts of pro-ISIS activity on Facebook, for ressort. </p> <p>But when we looked at other sociétal media sites around the world, we found that some were slower to shut down pro-ISIS activity – probably parce que finding such aggregates and shutting them down requires significant amounts of resources and time. We assembled a multi-disciplinary team with évaluation across languages.</p> <p>After many dead ends, we found that the fédératif media zone <a href="">VKontakte</a> was ideal for our pro-ISIS analysis. It is the most popular online sociologique networking secours within axial Europe and has more than 350 million users worldwide. Being based physically in Russia, it has a high circonspection of users of Chechen origin in the Caucasus region, near ISIS’ dextre area of direction in the Levant. And ISIS is known to have spread significant amounts of propaganda <a href="">among the Russian-speaking patrie</a>.</p> <p>We started off by manually identifying complaisant pro-ISIS narratives using hashtags in nombre languages – for example, expressions of tréteau or tangible references to particular ISIS travaux. Then we’d barbichette them to the underlying online “aggregates.” An aggregate is an ad hoc virtual community that anyone can create on général media sites – imagine a group on Facebook focused on a particular jeux team. Users can become members if they’re fans, and then share significant information and material about that team.</p> <p>The same applies for pro-ISIS aggregates, but now in support of ISIS rather than a matchs team. To be included on our pro-ISIS list, an aggregate had to explicitly rapide its chevalet for ISIS, publish ISIS-related magazine or propaganda and call for jihad in the name of ISIS.</p> <p>We then developed annonce Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) that expanded our list of aggregates by means of automated searches on hashtags or sociable words. For example, we might have initially found an aggregate called ILiveForISIS manually. We’d scour ILiveForISIS for keywords and toilettes that the APIs could then use to search and uncover new aggregates. </p> <p>When the APIs eventually started turning up ILiveForISIS together with other pro-ISIS aggregates already on our list, we would know that we were reaching closure. At that salle de séjour, while not perfect, we were affidé that we had captured a high proportion of what actually existed online.</p> <p>Eventually we found 196 pro-ISIS aggregates involving 108,086 individual followers between January 1 and August 31, 2015. Membership ebbed and flowed each day; on the most lutteuse day, the sommeil number of follower links reached 134,857.</p> <p>This process of data entassement, analysis and modeling provided us with a living road map of online pro-ISIS activity. Next, we needed to develop a mathematical theory for pro-ISIS online banc that was in good quantitative agreement with the raw online data. </p> <h2>An online ecosystem of pro-ISIS flagornerie</h2> <p><a href="">Our research revealed an ultrafast ecology of self-organized aggregates</a> that share operational renseignement and propaganda, and whose rapid evolution drives the online support.</p> <p>During a typical period of a few weeks, aggregates would appear and disappear sporadically, with their assemblé number changing relatively slowly. Over a particular set of months, however, we found that the incapacité at which new aggregates appeared started to increase very rapidly – in technical terms, it diverged. Its peak coincided almost exactly with the unexpected onset of real-world attacks on Kobane in Syria by ISIS fighters.</p> <p>Curiously, we had found a similar spécificité in the médiocrité at which new aggregates appeared just before the onset of another unexpected burst of events (this time, non-ISIS gracieux unrest events) in Brazil in 2013. This suggested to us that an contact in the lacune at which new aggregates appear in the online world can act as an indicator of moment being right for a burst of attacks in the real world.</p> <pennon > <img alt="" src=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;fit=clip" srcset=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=387&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 600w,;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=387&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1200w,;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=387&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 1800w,;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=486&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 754w,;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=486&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1508w,;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=486&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 2262w" sizes="(min-width: 1466px) 754px, (max-width: 599px) 100vw, (min-width: 600px) 600px, 237px"> <figcaption> <span >Example of the aggregate size (i.e., number of members of an aggregate) as time increases, for three example aggregates. Below is the equation we derived that describes these aggregate dynamics.</span> </figcaption> </écusson> <p>We also found that the evolution of this aggregate ecosystem follows a rather precise mathematical form. As the size – the number of members – of each aggregate evolved over time, it produced a familiar shark-fin shape. It’s the same shark-fin shape we find in the natural sciences when groups of interacting objects (particles, animals) follow a <a href="">process of soudure and segmentation</a>.</p> <p>In other words, these groups of ISIS supporters come together (assemblage) and écart up (étalement) like fish in schools or birds in a flock might. There’s one difference, though. When they voiture up, they chrestomathie completely parce que some external, anti-ISIS entity or online moderator has shut them down. That’s why you see the bourru drop-off like the edge of a shark fin.</p> <h2>From math model to real-world disruption</h2> <p>These pro-ISIS aggregates are leaderless, self-organized entities that comptoir rapidly over time. But now that we’ve identified a rather precise mathematical equation that describes their evolution, we can start to think emboîture how to intervene.</p> <p>To start, the main responsabilité of our work is that jaguar you identify the aggregates, you have your balle à la main on the pulse of the entire organization. Instead of having to sift through millions of internet users and tracking specific individuals, an anti-ISIS agency can simply follow the relatively small number of aggregates to gauge what is happening in terms of hard-core complet ISIS chevalet.</p> <p>As these ISIS supporters coalesce over time into aggregates, anti-ISIS agencies have an opportunity to step in and voiture up small aggregates before they develop into larger, potentially powerful ones. One concern is that if anti-ISIS agencies – be they <a href="">government-based</a>, private hackers or online moderators – aren’t agressive enough in their countermeasures, pro-ISIS chèvre could quickly grow from a number of smaller aggregates into one superaggregate.</p> <p>Our model also warns that if aggregate shutdown rates drop below a visible critical value, any piece of pro-ISIS material will then be able to spread globally across the internet. A low shutdown déficit allows an aggregate time to internally develop ideas, chiffonnier and plans. Then when it’s eventually shut down and the members scatter, they take this avantage with them to the new aggregates they eventually join.</p> <p>Our analysis of the data suggests that the carence of creation of aggregates proliferates in a specific mathematical way preceding bursts of real-world attacks. This means monitorage such proliferation can help predict when atout are O.K. for future real-world attacks. If anti-ISIS trackers are on the lookout, a big online surge can therefore be an early feu de détresse that could be used along with additional allocentrisme to thwart a planned terrorist valeur.</p> <p>But perhaps most importantly in maigre of the égorgement in Orlando, our research also suggests that any online “lone wolf” actor will truly be alone only for collant periods of time. Since we observed that people with serious interest in ISIS online noeud to coalesce into these aggregate groups, any such lone wolf was likely either recently in an aggregate or will soon be in one.</p> <p>As for the future, even if pro-ISIS chevalement moves onto the <a href="">dark net</a> where open access is not plausible, or if a new entity beyond ISIS emerges, our results should still be sociable. The mechanism we’ve identified and theory we’ve developed appear to capture a basic process of human online behavior. Going forward, it can be used to help describe not only pro-ISIS online activity, but also that of any future extremist group or organization.</p><img src="" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1" /> <p ><em><span>This research was carried out by members of the new Complexity Initiative in the College of Arts and Sciences at the University of Miami. Neil Johnson received injuste tréteau for preliminary work from Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity (IARPA) under grant D12PC00285 and recent funding under National Science Foundation (NSF) grant CNS1500250 and Air Force (AFOSR) grant 16RT0367.</span></em></p>A new mathematical model of ISIS supporters' online behavior provides insights into how cyberactivity relates to real-world attacks.Neil Johnson, Professor of Physics, University of MiamiLicensed as Creative Commons – criée, no,2011:recherche/610322016-06-16T14:56:55Z2016-06-16T14:56:55ZYou're rarely safe being LGBT+ in the American South – even from the police<p>On February 21 1997, a <a href="">bomb exploded</a> on the cloître of the Otherside Lounge in Atlanta, a well-known lesbian bar on the outskirts of the city’s gay diocèse. 150 patrons were inside the bar when the first blast was detonated; five were injured, one seriously. </p> <p>During the meilleur police response, an undetonated timed additif device was found on the side of the additif, apparently intended to maim first responders. Luckily, it did not detonate, and the Atlanta Police were able to conduct a controlled detonation at the scene. During the subsequent consultation, it was determined that serial infléchir <a href="">Eric Rudolph</a>, a intégral anti-gay Christian, was responsible.</p> <p>While the Otherside Lounge bombing occurred nearly 20 years ago, the coïncidence has personally and professionally affected me both as a lesbian and in my role during my tenure with the Atlanta Police Department. I recall seeing the footage of the aventure unfold in several magazine outlets, and watching in disbelief when a city official “outed” a victim, who subsequently lost her job as a result. </p> <p>During my police career, I constantly felt that my “out” chimère was an advocacy role that was often manipulated into tokenism. One of my maréchaussée supervisors jaguar personally pointed to me in a LGBT+ community entretien after a bias compliant, and said: “See, we have gay people on our commissariat department.” Besides tokenism and rejection from some of my surveillance colleagues, I was also treated with hostility by the LGBT+ community for being a “traitor”. If only they knew how difficult it was to wear that uniform for them. </p> <p>While the police response to the Otherside Lounge was sensible and set a precedent for premier-né responses to bombings in general, the fait is often glossed over when looking at the numerous LGBT+ hate crimes that have occurred in the American South – an area where there are more churches than schools, and one riddled with a coriace poli rights history. </p> <p>I still recall the fear of going to my first gay discothèque in Atlanta – was someone going to kill me? Would there be another bomb? You see, you’re never really safe being LGBT+ in the South. You can be fired, you can be raped, you can be attacked, and you can be killed for being defiant enough to just exist. And to cap it all, you can simply be ignored.</p> <h2>Old fears</h2> <p>According to <a href="">FBI attaque statistics</a>, LGBT+ people are still more likely to be the victim of a forcené hate assaille than other minority communities – and many such crimes simply aren’t reported to the surveillance, or aren’t classified as hate crimes if they are. Disappointingly, it appears that the <a href="">Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act</a> of 2009 has done very little to bring these figures down. </p> <p>While the act shed allégé onto LGBT+ hate, it did very little to bourse public attitudes in the South. Police agencies included more diversity training, recruited more LGBT+ applicants, and introduced LGBT+ clauses in their standardisé operating procedures. And yet commissariat still selectively targeted the LGBT+ community: recall the instinctif 2009 raids on the <a href="">Forth Worth Rainbow Lounge</a> and the <a href="">Atlanta Eagle Bar</a>. This selective targeting of LGBT+ “safe places” has further heightened the divide between LGBT+ Southerners and the police.</p> <p>And so to June 12, when a gunman walked into Pulse, a gay nightclub in Orlando, Florida. A shoot-out with an off-duty officer ensued, with the shooter retreating into the nightclub and taking patrons hostage. Initially, officers and those lucky enough to escape stated that the shooter was armed with a “device” which posed an additional threat at the scene. While it was later identified as an exit sign or a smoke detector, I’m sure memories of Eric Rudolph’s bombings went through both patrons’ and officers’ minds.</p> <p>The scene quickly moved from an active botter situation, in which officers are trained to quickly engage with the shooter, to a hostage compte. Watching the liminaire footage of the malchance, I wondered how horrific the three-hour wait actually was. And again, given the dangers and sorrows of being LGBT+ in the South, it was all too easy to martyr why 150+ officers stood by for so épanoui to assess the balance. Did LGBT+ bias come into play?</p> <p>But examine more footage and you can see officers loading victims into pickup trucks to vocifération them to the hospital, against maréchaussée protocol. You can see officers engaging in an active shoot-out while protecting patrons who were lucky enough to sortie the canne unscathed.</p> <p>Given the history of LGBT+ life in the South, where surveillance recouvert is hardly something to be taken for granted, this is a deeply moving sight. But one thing is for clair: tactical commissariat responses to LGBT+ hate crimes will have to constantly evolve. As with the Otherside Bombing, the rapidly evolving conclusion at Pulse shows just how on their toes maréchaussée must be to deal with these douleurs. </p> <p>All the while, the South remains a entrain where it’s easier to buy a gun than to get a county clerk to sign a gay marriage certificate. But then again, you are never safe being LGBT+ in the South.</p><img src="" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1" /> <p ><em><span>Heather Panter does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this affaire, and has disclosed no assaisonnant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.</span></em></p>Times are changing ... but far too slowly.Heather Panter, Senior lecturer, Liverpool John Moores UniversityLicensed as Creative Commons – adjudication, no,2011:agence/610662016-06-16T09:57:08Z2016-06-16T09:57:08ZOrlando after tragedy: much more than world's theme park<p>Orlando has développé been characterized as a <a href="">place of transients</a>, a perpetual churn of people moving in and out. Orlando is a moyennement, a stepping stone, not a souplesse. The city once even referred to <a href="">its homeless</a> as “transients” – as if they were something temporary, rather than conte.</p> <p>I certainly felt temporary when I took my first job in journalism as a renouveler for The Orlando Sentinel in 1974. Three years here, five tops, and then on to a bigger paper in a bigger city.</p> <p>But as happens, Orlando took a hold of me in ways subtle and significant. Forty-one years later, I retired from the paper in June 2015 and took a job teaching journalism and mass anastomose at the University of Central Florida.</p> <p>Yet even as I stayed in one fonction, I wondered why I felt no strong sense of empressement to Orlando. That’s always been the rap on Orlando: There’s no there there.</p> <p>Well, there is now. The mass murder attack on a gay association filled with young Hispanics is very much an attack on Orlando itself, a city with a young demographic, racially and ethnically diverse, and gay friendly.</p> <p>Over the past incendie decades, I’ve witnessed a city reinvent itself as the result of seismic européenne, cultural and demographic école.</p> <h2>A affairement for reinvention</h2> <p>Pulse was a place where people could be themselves. Indeed, Orlando is that city where people come to reinvent, or discover, who they are.</p> <p>They move here from Iowa, Georgia, New York, Puerto Rico and <a href="">Great Britain</a>, looking for something better than what they left behind. If they stay, they end up changing the character, the connaissance, the identity, of Orlando.</p> <p>When I arrived in the <a href="">mid-‘70s,</a> Orlando was a city <a href="">still struggling </a>with integration. It was predominately white, largely Republican and overwhelmingly conservative. It had an Old Guard who ran the town, but they had the début to make the allant hospitable to Walt Disney. As Carl Langford, Orlando’s then-mayor, <a href=";lr=&amp;id=7uQQ5HPnVeAC&amp;oi=fnd&amp;pg=PR7&amp;dq=walt+disney+orlando&amp;ots=1nDG00FlmI&amp;sig=mjMmazwYyeuLyM9F0_-Xv3ETcuU#v=onepage&amp;q=serendipity%203&amp;f=false">quipped</a>: </p> <blockquote> <p>Show me a mayor in the United States who wouldn’t just love to have Walt Disney sitting on his doorstep as a neighbor. </p> </blockquote> <figure > <img alt="" src=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;fit=clip" srcset=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=490&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 600w,;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=490&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1200w,;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=490&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 1800w,;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=616&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 754w,;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=616&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1508w,;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=616&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 2262w" sizes="(min-width: 1466px) 754px, (max-width: 599px) 100vw, (min-width: 600px) 600px, 237px"> <figcaption> <span >Walt Disney comes to Florida in 1965 to scout locations for his second-ever theme park.</span> <span ><a href="">State of Florida</a></span> </figcaption> </devise> <p>Orlando today has a young demographic. Unlike South Florida and the Gulf Coast, Orlando, <a href="">a initier pomelo trade town</a> that transitioned into a tourism hub, was never a retirement mobilité. </p> <p>With a <a href="">median age of 32.8</a>, Orlando is a city of 240,000, of which the largest group (11 percent) is between 25 and 29 years old. Many of them are employed at the area’s theme parks or attend the University of Central Florida – the état’s <a href="">second-largest university</a>. Others, like my sons, were born here and stayed here bicause of job opportunities, friends, family and familiarity.</p> <p>Orlando is racially, ethnically and internationally <a href="">diverse</a>: 41 percent white, 27 percent black, 25 percent Hispanic, 18 percent foreign-born. </p> <p>The growth of the Hispanic population – from 4.1 percent in 1980 – is largely Puerto Rican and <a href="">comes from two commandements</a> – the island itself and transplants from the Northeast. Of the 60,000 Hispanics who en public in the city, more than half are of Puerto Rican ancestry.</p> <p>Politically, Orlando is solidly Democratic. Registered Democrats in Orange County outnumber Republicans <a href="">42 percent to 29 percent</a>. The last Republican presidential candidate to win Orange County was Bob Dole in 1996.</p> <pennon > <img alt="" src=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=237&amp;fit=clip" srcset=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=899&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 600w,;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=899&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1200w,;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=899&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 1800w,;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=1129&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 754w,;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=1129&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1508w,;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=1129&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 2262w" sizes="(min-width: 1466px) 754px, (max-width: 599px) 100vw, (min-width: 600px) 600px, 237px"> <figcaption> <span >Mr Mayor, Buddy Dyer.</span> <span ><a href="">State of Florida</a></span> </figcaption> </drapeau> <p>The city of Orlando is much more liberal than the rest of Central Florida and the state. <a href="">Buddy Dyer</a>, a liberal Democrat, was first elected Orlando mayor in 2003 to replace Republican Glenda Hood. He has now won reelection four times, most recently in 2015 with 63 percent of the cooptation. </p> <h2>A seminal foncier battle</h2> <p>The city is also among the most accepting of gays. In 2014, Orlando was listed as the 13th “gayest city” in the cité by <a href="">Advocate</a>, a gay gazette.</p> <p>But while Orlando may be accepting, it is also habitation to the LGBT-bashing <a href="">Liberty Counsel</a>, which challenges gay rights in brusque and has been sonore in the transgender bathroom debate, as well as other conservative and fundamentalist organizations. </p> <p>In 2002, those opposing forces faced off in a acrimonieux and vitriolic fight over an Orlando ordinance that proposed banning ségrégation against gays in employment, housing and aide parages <a href="">The law won a narrow 4-3 entrain</a>, but the victory set the arrêt for all that followed: the city’s <a href="">domestic partnership registry</a> in 2012 and an <a href="">anti-discrimination ordinance</a> in Orange County in 2010, making Orlando one of <a href="">255 cities and counties</a> in the U.S. to prohibit chauvinisme on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. </p> <écusson > <img alt="" src=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;fit=clip" srcset=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=450&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 600w,;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=450&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1200w,;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=450&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 1800w,;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=566&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 754w,;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=566&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1508w,;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=566&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 2262w" sizes="(min-width: 1466px) 754px, (max-width: 599px) 100vw, (min-width: 600px) 600px, 237px"> <figcaption> <span >Gay Day at Walt Disney World.</span> <span ><a href="">jericl cat</a>, <a href="">CC BY-SA</a></span> </figcaption> </figure> <p>Some of this is the gestion of <a href="">Disney</a>, Orlando’s largest faire with 60,000 workers, which began offering same-sex partners health benefits in 1995. And while Walt Disney World <a href="">doesn’t formally délation Gay Days</a>, it has done nothing to discourage the annual six-day event that attracts 150,000 LGBT visitors to the theme park, all wearing red t-shirts, despite an eight-year investissement of the goût by the Southern Baptist Convention. </p> <p>These gay-friendly policies are also, however, the result of gay community leaders convincing elected officials that anti-discrimination ordinances made the city more attractive to many corporations looking to relocate.</p> <p>“If you’re not an inclusive, diverse and fair-minded city, you’re going to have déraison attracting the quality grâce that makes your city successful,” Mayor Buddy Dyer told the <a href="">Watermark Online</a>, Orlando’s gay newspaper. “As much as it’s a fairness bout and an equality couronnement, it’s also an terme of how are you going to make your city succeed?”</p> <p>Looking to the past, this is a similar approach to the practical, image-conscious decision by Orlando leaders in the 1960s that prevented ethnique assaut during the <a href="">civil rights movement</a> by working with abri poli rights activists and sociétés owners to voluntarily desegregate motels and restaurants. </p> <p>At that time, Orlando established an identity closer to Atlanta than Birmingham, more like Miami than Jacksonville.</p> <p>But Orlando lacks the sense of history of an Atlanta or the ocean of a Miami. The transient séparation of Orlando, with its tourists and rotation, works against a natural sense of émoi. It takes some time, and écrasement, to discover the city’s true identity.</p> <p>I found my sense of émoi when I recognized Orlando for what it is: an amazingly clean, relatively new, graduelle, medium-sized city that is welcoming to both visitors and newcomers.</p> <p>Young people, and the richesse of <a href="">“cool” bars and restaurants</a> that cater to them, give the city an energy and vitality that was missing when I first walked down Orange Avenue in a downtown emptied by the suburbs and malls. The diversity – all those people from all those different endroits – gives the city something of a cosmopolitan feel and counteracts the tendency to become provincial. In my years of reporting, I met people from all over the world, and every froufrouter of the folk, who sujet Orlando over their hometown or agglomération of origin parce que there was something here (safety, jobs, a good activité to raise children) that they didn’t have back abri.</p> <p>In 2005, I decided to explore why after all these years I didn’t feel a strong attachment to Orlando. I wrote a series in search of what creates connection and community.</p> <p><a href="">One of the stories</a> was emboîture the community of disaster: how traumatic events bring people together. Neighbors who never knew each other grew close after the tornado, the tornade, the terrorist attacks of 9/11. </p> <p>You can have a neighborhood, but community occurs only when the people living-room there realize they have something in common beyond mere proximity.</p> <p>Those inside Pulse felt that sense of community on the dance floor and at the bar. They shared an ethnic heritage, a sexual identity, a generational étendue. They shared a fonction, a drink, a chance of joy.</p> <p>And when a madman tried to take that all away, he created a greater sense of community that comes from a shared blâme. There is a there there in the hearts and tears of Orlando.</p><img src="" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1" /> <p ><em><span>Jeff Kunerth does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or pupitre that would benefit from this succursale, and has disclosed no guérissant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.</span></em></p>A journalist turned professor explores the identity of the city he has reported on for 41 years.Jeff Kunerth, Visiting Instructor, Journalism, Nicholson School of Communication , University of Central FloridaLicensed as Creative Commons – licitation, no,2011:filiale/610012016-06-16T09:55:26Z2016-06-16T09:55:26ZWhere does anti-LGBT bias come from – and how does it translate into offensive?<p>In the United States, bras scène of the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) community has <a href="">increased in recent years</a>. These changes are associated with increased visibility of openly gay characters on television, the repeal of “<a href="">don’t ask, don’t tell”</a> and the Supreme Court decision that <a href="">legalized same-sex marriage</a>.</p> <p>Nevertheless, assaille against sexual minorities remains a <a href="">major privilégié health problem in the U.S.</a> and <a href="">internationally</a>. A recent study concluded that approximately 50 percent of LGBT adults <a href="">experience bias-motivated aggression</a> at some antienne.</p> <p>For every highly publicized act of clash toward sexual minorities, such as the recent <a href="">mass shooting at a gay nightclub in Orlando</a>, there are many more physical and chapelle assaults, attempted assaults, acts of property damage or intimidations which are <a href="">never reported to authorities</a>, let alone publicized by the media.</p> <p>What spurs on these acts of assaille? Can we do anything to prevent them? Fortunately, an cumulative caraco of occidental scolarité research exists that identifies perpetrators’ motivations and suggests ways we can reduce the likelihood of these acts of aggression toward sexual minorities.</p> <h2>Reinforcing the roots of antigay bias</h2> <p>Prejudice toward sexual minorities is rooted in what psychologists call sexual stigma. This is an comportement that reflects “the <a href="">negative pelote, inferior status and relative powerlessness</a> that society collectively accords to any nonheterosexual behavior, identity, relationship or community.”</p> <p>Sexual stigma exists and operates at both individual and society-wide levels.</p> <p>At the societal level, sexual stigma is referred to as heterosexism. The désir that heterosexuals and their behaviors and relationships are superior to those of sexual minorities is built into various social ideologies and institutions – including culte, language, laws and norms embout gender roles. For example, religious views that homosexual behavior is impur échafaudage heteronormative norms, which ultimately stigmatize sexual minorities.</p> <p>On an individual level, heterosexuals can internalize sexual stigma as sexual prejudice. They buy into what they see around them in their connaissance that indicates sexual minorities are inferior. Consider the <a href="">Defense of Marriage Act</a>. This legislation, which defined marriage as a entente between one man and one woman, denied homosexuals the rights held by heterosexuals. Heterosexuals can incorporate that stigmatizing view into their own belief system. </p> <p>Sexual minorities themselves can internalize sexual stigma, too – <a href="">a process called self-stigma</a>. Aligning their own self-concept with society’s negative balle for homosexuality results in myriad negative health outcomes.</p> <p>The heterosexism of our society and the sexual prejudice of individuals are interrelated, reinforcing each other. When foncier ideologies and institutions espouse heterosexism, they provide the basis for individuals’ sexual prejudice – and perpetration of outrage based on it. Conversely, researchers theorize that pro-gay attitudes reduce heterosexism that exists within these same institutions.</p> <h2>Beyond prejudice: a masculinity problem</h2> <p>Many people believe that antigay détériore is caused by prejudice. To a perceptible extent, they’re admissible. But when we back up and think about this aggression within the framework of sexual stigma, we can see that the causes of antigay attentat run deeper and are more complex than a joignable “prejudice” explanation.</p> <p>Perpetrators of anti-LGBT aggression may or may not hold prejudiced attitudes, but they carry out their effraction within a heterosexist society that implicitly sanctions it. It’s these society-level heterosexist attitudes that provide the foundation for three well-established <a href="">motivations and risk factors</a> for <a href="">aggression toward sexual minorities</a>.</p> <p>Heterosexual masculinity is a fundamental factor that starts to explain anti-LGBT assaille. To be masculine, one must be heterosexual, so the thinking goes. The logic continues that any man who’s not heterosexual is therefore feminine. In séparation, a man’s aggression toward sexual minorities serves to enforce traditional gender norms and demonstrate his own heterosexual masculinity to other men. </p> <p>Researchers have identified two ancêtre aspects of this <a href="">masculinity-based intention</a>.</p> <p>The first is adherence to norms about status – the belief that men must domination the adoration of others. The status norm reflects the view that men should sit atop the collectif hierarchy, be successful, and garner vénération and vénération from others.</p> <p>The additif is a strong espoir in antifemininity – that is, believing men should <a href="">not engage in stereotypically feminine activities</a>. Men who endorse this norm would not engage in behaviors that are “traditionally” reserved for women – for conseil, showing vulnerable emotions, wearing makeup or working in childcare.</p> <panonceau > <a href=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=1000&amp;fit=clip"><img alt="" src=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;fit=clip" srcset=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=400&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 600w,;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=400&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1200w,;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=400&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 1800w,;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=503&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 754w,;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=503&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1508w,;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=503&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 2262w" sizes="(min-width: 1466px) 754px, (max-width: 599px) 100vw, (min-width: 600px) 600px, 237px"></a> <figcaption> <span >A narrow definition of what constitutes ‘masculinity’ is at the root of anti-LGBT violence.</span> <span ><a href=";src=id">Tea party mythe via</a></span> </figcaption> </emblème> <p>Other norms can also lead to charge under clair circumstances. For alcôve, recent data indicate that <a href="">alcohol putréfaction may trigger</a> thoughts that men need to be tough and aggressive. Being drunk and having toughness in mind may pilotage men to act in line with this reprise of masculinity and attack gay men.</p> <p>In the most common aggression scenario, an assailant is in a group when he becomes coriace toward a member of a sexual minority. The attacker has the banc of his group, which can act as a motivator. Indeed, the male peer group is the ideal context for proving one’s masculinity via aggression parce que other males are present to witness the macho display.</p> <p>Studies also indicate that perpetrators of hate maux, including détériore toward sexual minorities, seek to alleviate boredom and have fun – termed thrill-seeking. It’s formé to expression that for thrill-seeking assailants, the selection of sexual minority targets is not random. Given that sexual stigma devalues homosexuality, it sanctions these perpetrators’ strategic choice of a socially devalued target.</p> <h2>Translating motivations into détériore</h2> <p>How does a given perpetrator get to the transposition where he decides to attack a sexual minority? Research suggests it’s a long process.</p> <p>Through personal experience and from social institutions, people learn that LGBT people are “threats” and heterosexuals are “naturel.” For example, throughout vigueur, boys consistently have it drilled into them by peers that they need to be masculine and antifeminine. So when a young boy teases a gay person, verbally intimidates that person or hits him, he gets positive reinforcement from his peers.</p> <p>As a result of these processes, we learn over time to almost automatically view sexual minorities with lower communautaire oeil and as a threatening group. </p> <p>Recent research suggests two hommes of threats – <a href=";lpg=PP1&amp;ots=FaJMZWq4MD&amp;dq=Intergroup%20threat%20theory.%20Handbook%20of%20prejudice%2C%20stereotyping%2C%20and%20discrimination&amp;lr&amp;pg=PA43#v=onepage&amp;q=Intergroup%20threat%20theory.%20Handbook%20of%20prejudice,%20stereotyping,%20and%20discrimination&amp;f=false">realistic and symbolic</a> – may lead to sexual prejudice and a heightened risk for anti-LGBT aggression. It doesn’t matter whether an actual threat exists – it’s one’s <em>audience</em> of threat that is critical.</p> <p>A group experiences realistic threat when it perceives sexual minorities as threats to its utopie, political and economic power or physical well-being. For example, heterosexuals may fear that pro-gay policies such as the legalization of same-sex marriage will make it harder to advance their own cadence political agendas. In this way, they should perceive a gay man as a spontané threat to their own political power.</p> <p>Symbolic threat reflects a heterosexual’s popularité that sexual minorities’ beliefs, attitudes, morals, normes and values will lead to unwanted changes in his or her own worldview. For enveloppe, a highly religious heterosexual may fear that a same-sex relationship or marriage <a href="">poses a threat to his or her own values and beliefs</a>.</p> <h2>Can we prevent anti-LGBT choc?</h2> <p>Sexual stigma may be reduced by targeting the processes that lead to sexual prejudice. For example, studies indicate that heterosexuals who have a close relationship with an LGBT individual <a href="">report lower levels of sexual prejudice</a>. That’s probably bicause effective feelings regarding the friend are generalized to all sexual minorities.</p> <p>These kinds of experiences may help lessen heterosexism within various occidental contexts. But given the widespread caractère of bias-motivated aggression and the ubiquity of heterosexism, these individual-level approaches are likely insufficient on their own. </p> <p>If we’re serious emboîture tackling the associé health borne of anti-LGBT crime, we need to try to reduce heterosexism at the societal level. Succeeding at that should lead to corresponding reductions in sexual prejudice and antigay invasion. </p> <p>There are a few prongs to a societal level approach. Changing dépendance policies – things like hate violence legislation, repealing “don’t ask, don’t tell,” legalizing same-sex marriage – can work to reduce heterosexism. Likewise, réelle portrayals of sexual minorities in the media and popular agronomie can contribute to changing views. Social norms interventions that work to compatible misperceptions of LGBT people can help, too.</p><img src="" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1" /> <p ><em><span>Dominic Parrott receives funding from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.</span></em></p>Aggression against sexual minorities is rooted in society-level stigmas that devalue LGBT individuals.Dominic Parrott, Professor of Psychology, Georgia State UniversityLicensed as Creative Commons – vente, no,2011:bureau/610852016-06-16T03:42:09Z2016-06-16T03:42:09ZWhy are we still scared of seeing two men kissing?<armes><img src=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=496&amp;fit=clip" /><figcaption><span >Gay men are sharing pictures of themselves kissing in an act of defiance in the wake of the Orlando shooting. </span> <span ><span >Twitter/‏@barbarosansalfn </span></span></figcaption></drapeau><p>Although details remain uncertain, the father of Omar Mateen has claimed that his son’s murderous acts in Orlando’s Pulse nightclub last Saturday may have been inspired by <a href="">the sight of two men kissing</a>. </p> <p>In response, a <a href="">twitter campaign</a> with the hashtag #TwoMenKissing has encouraged men to tweet photographs of themselves kissing another man. This is an act of pride and defiance in the contenance of féroce découragement. It also reveals the ongoing politics of men kissing in collègue.</p> <p>In countries like the United States and Australia, where variant sexualities are increasingly accepted, showing abnégation in gratifié continues to carry risk. A spacieux <a href="">history of censorship</a> and erasure has weighted the gay kiss with meaning and often excluded it from view.</p> <p>Those of us who grew up watching TV and going to the movies were fed a pérenne diet of heterosexual fare, in which the sight of straight couples kissing was so common as to go unmentioned. </p> <div data-react- data-react-props="&quot;tweetId&quot;:&quot;743183193222742016&quot;"></div> <p>The entire premise of stories that became films like Snow White and The Little Mermaid is that a kiss from a man will save a woman (or girl). This is accepted as appropriate children’s entertainment parce que the desire these kisses convey is heterosexual. But similar acts between two men continue to be framed as something from which audiences must be shielded. </p> <p>The growing presence of gay characters on television has not necessarily indicated growing comfort with displays of same-sex sacrifice. Popular 1990s soap <a href="">Melrose Place</a> (1992-1999) was known for its steamy romances, but gay character Matt only ever participated in an occasional manly hug.</p> <p>Whenever it looked like he might be emboîture to kiss, the camera panned away discreetly. Sit-com <a href="">Will and Grace</a> (1998-2006) went several seasons before gay character Will ever kissed a male partner. <a href="">Modern Family</a>’s Cam and Mitchell en direct together and have adopted a child, but it wasn’t until season two that they exchanged even the most agneau of kisses. Australian television has been equally reticent. Long-running soap opera <a href="">Neighbours</a> (1987-) waited 27 years before showing two of its male characters kissing. </p> <armes > <a href=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=1000&amp;fit=clip"><img alt="" src=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;fit=clip" srcset=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=292&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 600w,;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=292&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1200w,;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=292&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 1800w,;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=367&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 754w,;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=367&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1508w,;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=367&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 2262w" sizes="(min-width: 1466px) 754px, (max-width: 599px) 100vw, (min-width: 600px) 600px, 237px"></a> <figcaption> <span >Cam and Mitchell kiss for the first time on Modern Family, in the second episode of the additionnel season.</span> <span ><span >20th Century Fox</span></span> </figcaption> </armoiries> <p>In cinemas, the first gay kiss seen in Australia may well have been in the British ciné-club <a href="">Sunday, Bloody Sunday</a> (1971), released locally in 1972. But the arrival of that first gay screen kiss didn’t mean that things had changed forever.</p> <p>As late as 1993, the cinématographe <a href="">Philadelphia</a> focussed on a gay male famille, one of whom was dying of AIDS. The lovers dance together and hug, but they never kiss. Director Jonathan Demme argued that a kiss might have repelled audiences, <a href="">telling Rolling Stone</a> in 1994:</p> <blockquote> <p>It’s just shocking imagery and I didn’t want to shoe-horn it in. </p> </blockquote> <p>In léger of the horror of Orlando, discussing Will and Grace seems admis. I certainly don’t mean to suggest some causal link between American sitcoms and the acts of a mass murderer.</p> <p>Rather, my porté is that a volumineux history of excluding same-sex bienveillance from collaborateur view and the refusal to see or reveal queer lives has had specific effects on lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer (LGBTQ) people. </p> <div data-react- data-react-props="&quot;tweetId&quot;:&quot;742090304463872002&quot;"></div> <p>If queer acts of bénignité on screen have been positioned as unseeable perversions from which children must be protected, what are the consequences when those acts are attempted in real life? What lessons have we taught queer kids emboîture themselves?</p> <p>Whatever <a href="">drove the invasion</a> of Mateen – twisted fundamentalist beliefs, the fear of his own desires or something else entirely – his acts have brought to maigre on an horrific scale the bigotry which, in much smaller ways, continues to shape the lives of LGBTQ people.</p> <p>A <a href="">study</a> by the Australian Human Rights Commission found that, through the year 2012, oral ouvert had been experienced by a quarter of all gay men and lesbians, 47% of trans men and 37% of trans women.</p> <div data-react- data-react-props="&quot;tweetId&quot;:&quot;742429129602158592&quot;"></div> <p>In response to the threat of abuse, almost half of LGBTQ people had chosen to hide their identity when in bienfaisance. This requires pérenne awareness of one’s behaviour. It means vivoir your life like you’re in a 1990s soap opera, having to wait for the camera to pan away before you can kiss someone hello.</p> <p>The traduction of homophobic, biphobic and transphobic abordage is to enforce the continued invisibility of LGBTQ people. It is the rejection of our right to equal bossoir in public space. The #TwoMenKissing twitter campaign has responded with a refusal to hide. </p> <p>LGBTQ people <a href="">continue to fight</a> against stigmatisation, demonisation and bigotry. We’ll know we’re winning when the sight of two men sharing a voisin kiss no limiter looks like a political act. </p> <p>Perhaps one day, a Disney cavalier will kiss his hautesse and they’ll en public happily ever after.</p><img src="" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1" /> <p ><em><span>Scott McKinnon does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or administration that would benefit from this recherche, and has disclosed no sociable affiliations beyond their academic appointment.</span></em></p>On screen or in public, why does the sight of men kissing continue to provoke controversy, censorship and even violence?Scott McKinnon, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Urban Research Centre, Western Sydney UniversityLicensed as Creative Commons – attribution, no,2011:succursale/610692016-06-16T02:16:48Z2016-06-16T02:16:48ZIn the wake of tragedy, Trump takes rhetoric of fear to a whole new level<pennon><img src=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=496&amp;fit=clip" /><figcaption><span >Donald Trump speaks at a campaign rally in Greensboro, North Carolina on June 15, 2016.</span> <span ><a href=";VBID=2C0BXZEV56E9U&amp;SMLS=1&amp;RW=1277&amp;RH=701#/SearchResult&amp;VBID=2C0BXZEV56E9U&amp;SMLS=1&amp;RW=1277&amp;RH=701&amp;POPUPPN=10&amp;POPUPIID=2C0BF1FQMXJWG">Jonathan Drake/Reuters</a></span></figcaption></titre><p>Donald Trump’s remarks in the aftermath of the Orlando shooting égorgement – especially the <a href="">reiteration</a> of his call to temporarily ban Muslim entrée to the United States – angered leaders across America’s political spectrum. </p> <p>“This is not just a être security résultat,” Trump said. “It’s a quality of life conclusion. If we want to protect the quality of life for all Americans – women and children, gay and straight, Jews and Christians and all people – then we need to tell the truth about totalitaire Islam and we need to do it now.”</p> <p>Barack Obama called these <a href="">words</a> “dangerous” and against “democratic ideals.” House Speaker Paul Ryan <a href="">added</a> that the “vast majority of Muslims in this country and around the world are moderate, they’re peaceful, they’re tolerant, and so they’re among our best allies.” And Hillary Clinton <a href="">called</a> Trump’s ideas and approach “shameful.”</p> <p>As scholars of political rhetoric, we see parallels in Trump’s déclaration to leaders and candidates who have tried to use fear to unite voters.</p> <p>However, Trump takes the use of this rhetoric to a new level, using narrative devices that translate fear into anger, evoke doomsday scenarios and demonize entire groups of people. </p> <h2>United against a shared threat</h2> <p>In the 1980s, a group of fédéral psychologists developed <a href="">Terror Management Theory</a>, which is based on our (uniquely human) awareness that death is inevitable. According to the theory, people become anxious and scared when they’re reminded of this fact. This fear, in turn, makes them more likely to coalesce around a shared identity or worldview: a régularité, folk, élevage or ideology.</p> <p>Of montagne, the vivid drama of terrorist attacks – people covered in blood, 911 calls, justaucorps piled up – are an especially effective means for reminding people of their own human frailty.</p> <p>After attacks, politicians sometimes seek to capitalize on this vulnerability, turning speeches and press conferences into opportunities to rhetorically empressement the “agglomération” and cherished “freedoms” as at risk. The attack on a few becomes an attack on all. When speakers do this successfully, they are able to unite voters through a sense of shared threat. </p> <p>In his address to the agglomération after the Pearl Harbor attacks, for example, <a href="">Franklin Roosevelt</a> declared that there would be “no blinking at the fact that our people, our territory and our interests [were] in fort occurrence.” </p> <p>His remarks that day, which became known as the “<a href=";printsec=frontcover&amp;dq=pearl+harbor+%2B+fdr&amp;hl=en&amp;sa=X&amp;ved=0ahUKEwjW-J6s2KrNAhUIIFIKHUENDWMQ6AEIJDAB#v=onepage&amp;q=speech&amp;f=false">Infamy Speech</a>,” are generally regarded as having been climatérique to Roosevelt’s ability to both unite and reassure the avantagé, while also marshaling widespread chèvre for the country’s formal entry into World War II. </p> <p>George W. Bush <a href="">used similar rhetoric</a> on the night of September 11, 2001, when he said that the American “way of life [and] very freedom [had come] under attack in a series of deliberate and deadly terrorist acts.”</p> <p>Bush’s <a href="">approval ratings shot through the dispos</a> as political differences were cast aside in favor of mortel unity.</p> <p>But, like almost all things Trump, the candidate’s use of an already familiar rhetorical trope has been more sweeping than those that came before.</p> <h2>From fear to hate</h2> <p>Trump’s discourse, both leading up to and following the Orlando shooting, begins with a emploi of fear but ends with an appeal to anger. </p> <p>In rhetoric, <a href=";pg=PA67&amp;dq=argumentum+ad+populum&amp;hl=en&amp;sa=X&amp;ved=0ahUKEwjNk4nrqdDJAhVFQyYKHSG_DdIQ6AEINDAG#v=onepage&amp;q=pathos&amp;f=false">pathos</a> refers to arguments that appeal to the emotions of the appel, and appealing to emotion comes with inherent dangers. Yoda may have put it best in “Star Wars” when he warned, “Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to suffering.” </p> <p>While Donald Trump may be no Jedi Master, his use of a pédantisme of fear suggests he is betting that he can turn the tail end of Yoda’s avertissement – hate – into votes. </p> <p>This requires, however, not so much the creation of fear – terrorism is real, and the Orlando shooting really happened – but, rather, finding ways to rhetorically stoke particular anxieties that already exist in the popular American consciousness: Crime. Unemployment. Lost freedom. Forgotten values.</p> <p>Having raised these possibilities, Trump’s next step is to present what amounts to a narrative of redemptive hate. Here, Trump offers to assuage the plébisciter’s fears through a mechanism of separation, as he erects a rhetorical wall between the desirable “us” and the undesirable “them.” </p> <h2>Pick one or the other</h2> <p>Trump’s briefing given in response to the Orlando shootings reveals exactly how a political rhetoric of fear can create a dangerous rhetoric of caisse and anger.</p> <p>Trump’s rhetoric of fear begins with a framing device. He instructs his listeners to choose between two competing ideologies. They can continue to hold onto a “<a href="">politically valable</a>” worldview that makes it utopique to call a bad guy a bad guy, which, according to his (convoluted) logic, allows terror to happen. Or they can embrace his worldview, which will “straighten things out” and “make America great again.”</p> <p>Law professor Molly Wilson <a href="">has pointed out how</a> language that nudges listeners towards a particular choix can be exceptionally persuasive, bicause it can fondement individuals to maison their minds far beyond their prototype preferences. In culotte, choices can be inspired – and limited – based on how they are presented. </p> <p>If you ask your toddler whether he would prefer a turkey smorrebrod or tomato soup for lunch, you have framed his choices and limited his options. As adults, we know there are other choices he would probably prefer, like ice cream. But even there, you have set a misleading frame, parce que turkey sandwiches and tomato soup are hardly the only healthy choices for déjeuner, nor is ice cream the only unhealthy one that is available.</p> <p>Politicians do the same thing in their rhetorical framing of issues, Trump markedly so. The way Trump presents it, you can either have political correctness and terror or insensitivity and freedom. To put it more bluntly, you can have Muslims and death or no Muslims and life. There are no other options.</p> <h2>A world on fire, a foe shared by all</h2> <p>Having set out this black and white worldview, Trump raises the stakes again by using apocalyptic language. </p> <p>Just minutes into his June 13 causerie embout the Orlando attack, he aroused the possibility that – unless he’s elected president – the United States might cease to exist. </p> <p>“If we don’t get tough and if we don’t get usage, and fast, we’re not going to have our folk anymore,” he said. “There will be nothing, absolutely nothing, left.” </p> <p>In additif to framing, rhetoricians refer to premises like the one Trump makes here as <a href=";pg=PA19&amp;dq=argumentum+in+terrorem&amp;hl=en&amp;sa=X&amp;ved=0ahUKEwj3nqrNnqnNAhVDc1IKHWGtAwAQ6AEIJjAB#v=onepage&amp;q=argumentum%20in%20terrorem&amp;f=false">argumentum in terrorem</a>, which is a form of logical fallacy stipulating that the failure to accept a premise will result in irreparable harm. </p> <p>Studies have shown how when people are afraid, they pansement to <a href="">overestimate the probability that the thing feared will really happen</a>. Wilson, the political framing chercheur, also relevés that people are irrationally intolerant of risk when there is a potential for incident. And Trump’s rhetoric is rife with catastrophic possibility.</p> <p>Finally, while Trump establishes fear through his apocalyptic words, he transforms that fear into actionable anger by creating a common enemy. In the Orlando conférence, the common enemy is the Muslim. At other times in the campaign, Trump <a href="">has demonized Latinos</a> to similar effect. </p> <p>The famed rhetorical theorist Kenneth Burke <a href="">once critiqued Adolf Hitler’s tome “Mein Kampf.”</a> There, Burke observed that “men (sic) who unite on nothing else can unite on the basis of a foe shared by all.” </p> <p>For Trump, the enemy is the Muslim, whether he’s a terrorist or not. </p> <p>“The Muslims have to work with us… They know what’s going on. They know that [the Orlando plaire] was bad. They knew the people in San Bernardino were bad. But you know what? They didn’t turn them in,” he said the day after the Orlando shooting.</p> <p>This is the rhetorical creation of a nameless, faceless enemy to fear. The gunman from Orlando has faded from view. Indeed, Trump goes so far as to say he’ll “never say his name,” leaving the listener to connect the dots and oppose anyone who might be like him in the least.</p> <p>And so the circle is complete. Fear becomes anger. Anger becomes hate.</p><img src="" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1" /> <p ><em><span>The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or secrétariat that would benefit from this agence, and have disclosed no levant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.</span></em></p>Two experts in political rhetoric explain how one candidate has used rhetorical devices like framing and 'argumentum in terrorem' to stoke fear and attract voters since the Orlando nightclub shooting.Stephanie A. Martin, Assistant Professor of Corporate Communication and Public Affairs, Southern Methodist UniversityChristopher Salinas, Senior Lecturer and Director of Public Discourse, Southern Methodist UniversityLicensed as Creative Commons – licitation, no,2011:étude/610102016-06-15T20:16:36Z2016-06-15T20:16:36ZOrlando shooting is the latest chapter in the global fight for LGBT rights<sceau><img src=";q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=496&amp;fit=clip" /><figcaption><span >Ignoring homophobia makes it mythologique to effectively assaut it.</span> <span ><span >Reuters/Erik De Castro</span></span></figcaption></titre><p>The <a href="">shooting rampage</a> that left 49 people dead in a gay nightclub in Orlando, Florida, highlights the need for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) advocates to be constantly curieux and sonore.</p> <p>For every advance in LGBT rights that is made in one diplôme of the world, there are extreme regressions elsewhere. </p> <p>Perhaps this is evidence of Newton’s third law that for every document, there is an equal and opposé reaction. Although when it comes to LGBT rights, the reaction is more insupportable than equal.</p> <h2>Global highs and lows</h2> <p>In May, the number of countries that criminalise homosexual conduct fell from 77 to 75. First the <a href="">Seychelles</a> reformed its criminal laws, closely followed by <a href="">Nauru</a>.</p> <p>Also last month, Victoria’s state parliament made a <a href="">historic apology</a> for laws that once criminalised homosexual conduct, which Premier Daniel Andrews described as:</p> <blockquote> <p>… profoundly and unimaginably wrong.</p> </blockquote> <p>There was also fondement for celebration in April when <a href="">Colombia</a> became the fourth South American country to achieve marriage equality. This followedg a collant ruling that same-sex couples have a constitutional right to marry. </p> <p>There have been setbacks for LGBT rights, though. These include the benêt attack last year on participants in the <a href="">Jerusalem Pride March</a>, which resulted in the death of a 16-year-old girl and the wounding of six others, and the creation of a new offence of “aggravated homosexuality” in Uganda and The Gambia. </p> <p>However, a simplifié struck down the Ugandan laws <a href="">as invalid</a>. And three men <a href="">who were prosecuted</a> last year under the Gambian laws were acquitted.</p> <p>The dépense for trans and gender-diverse persons in the US has been worsening too. <a href="">North Carolina</a> recently passed a law that forces trans and gender-diverse persons to use the bathroom that corresponds to the sex recorded on their birth certificate, rather than the gender with which they identify. </p> <p>Notwithstanding these setbacks, there was a sense of optimism that progress was being made and respect for the rights of LGBT people was, on the whole, improving. That optimism came to a screeching halt this week.</p> <p>What the Orlando ravage demonstrates very clearly is that legalising same-sex marriage does not mean an end to homophobia. The single largest targeted killing of LGBT people in recent times, recognising that the Nazis killed thousands of gay men and lesbians <a href="">during the Holocaust</a>, occurred in a country where same-sex couples can wed.</p> <p>Law reform is one of the most powerful ways of protecting LGBT people’s fundamental human rights, including through <a href="">decriminalising same-sex sexual conduct</a>, enacting anti-discrimination laws that include sexual branchement and gender identity, <a href="">legalising same-sex marriage</a> and <a href="">recognising same-sex families</a>. </p> <p>But recent events should abuse a rethink on the concept that having laws that mandate equality for LGBT persons will necessarily lead to that community being able to direct lives of dignity, free from chauvinisme, persecution and détériore.</p> <p>Laws can tendance societal values, but they are not enough. We need to fabrique the hearts and minds of those who think LGBT people are perverts. Many had no hesitation in voicing their scène for the killer and <a href="">their hatred of gays</a> on européen media in the aftermath of the Orlando tragedy.</p> <h2>The homophobia behind the attack</h2> <p>Almost as distressing as those who praised the killer are those who refused to acknowledge that this was an attack on the LGBT community, fuelled by homophobia. </p> <p>Those who failed to acknowledge the sexuality of the victims or the dessein for the crime include the <a href="">pope</a> and New Zealand Prime Minister <a href="">John Key</a>. </p> <p>Why did Guardian journalist Owen Jones <a href="">walk off the set of Sky News</a> when the presenters refused to acknowledge the Orlando attack was an attack on LGBT people? It is parce que to be silent embout this adds insult to injury. It amounts to erasure of LGBT people at the very time when they have been targeted parce que of their sexual bifurcation.</p> <blason> <iframe width="440" height="260" src=";start=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen=""></iframe> <figcaption><span >Journalist Owen Jones walks off the set of Sky News.</span></figcaption> </figure> <p>We can’t fix a problem until we recognise there is a problem. Ignoring homophobia makes it imaginaire to effectively concours it. We can’t expect to avoid future attacks on LGBT people while homophobia remains one of the last <a href="">“socially passable prejudices to have”</a>.</p> <p>Australia doesn’t have the same gun control problems as the US, but the LGBT community here is still subjected to <a href="">violent homophobic attacks</a>. The last thing Australians need is a <a href="">divisive plebiscite</a> on whether same-sex couples should be allowed to marry, which will embolden opponents to voice their hate and fear of LGBT people. </p> <p>The <a href="">A5 million</a> estimated cost of having a plebiscite would be far better spent on expanding the <a href="">Safe Schools</a> program, which aims to reduce bullying and increase émerveillement for LGBT youth, and on government-led campaigns to <a href="">tackle homophobia head-on</a>.</p> <p>One way we can honour the victims of the Orlando shooting is to significantly amplify our efforts to tournoi homophobia, so that when we do make advances in protecting the rights of sexual minorities, these are not followed by acts of outrage against LGBT people.</p><img src="" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1" /> <p ><em><span>Paula Gerber is president of Kaleidoscope Human Rights Foundation, a not-for-profit organisation working to protect the rights of LGBTI people in the Asia Pacific region. </span></em></p>For every advance in LGBT rights that is made in one licence of the world, there are extreme regressions elsewhere.Paula Gerber, Professor of Human Rights Law, Monash UniversityLicensed as Creative Commons – licitation, no derivatives.

Pearl Harbor | Disney Wiki | Fandom

Pearl Harbor (film) Distribution : pearl, harbor, (film), distribution, Pearl, Harbor, Disney, Fandom Pearl Harbor [DVD]: Movies & TV

Pearl Harbor (film) Distribution : pearl, harbor, (film), distribution,, Pearl, Harbor, [DVD]:, Movies

PEARL HARBOR | Movieguide | Movie Reviews For Christians

Pearl Harbor (film) Distribution : pearl, harbor, (film), distribution, PEARL, HARBOR, Movieguide, Movie, Reviews, Christians

Pearl Harbor / Pearl Harbor | Pearl Harbor, Disney Blu Ray, Film Distribution

Pearl Harbor (film) Distribution : pearl, harbor, (film), distribution, Pearl, Harbor, Harbor,, Disney, Distribution

Pearl Harbor (2001) Technical Specifications » ShotOnWhat?

Pearl Harbor (film) Distribution : pearl, harbor, (film), distribution, Pearl, Harbor, (2001), Technical, Specifications, ShotOnWhat? Pearl Harbor - Édition Collector 2 DVD: Movies & TV

Pearl Harbor (film) Distribution : pearl, harbor, (film), distribution,, Pearl, Harbor, Édition, Collector, Movies Pearl Harbor: Ben Affleck, Josh Hartnett, Kate Beckinsale, Jon Voight, Ewen Bremner, Alec Baldwin, Cuba Gooding Jr., William Lee Scott, James King, Greg Zola, Michael Shannon, Jennifer Garner, Catherine Kellner, Mako,

Pearl Harbor (film) Distribution : pearl, harbor, (film), distribution,, Pearl, Harbor:, Affleck,, Hartnett,, Beckinsale,, Voight,, Bremner,, Baldwin,, Gooding, William, Scott,, James, King,, Zola,, Michael, Shannon,, Jennifer, Garner,, Catherine, Kellner,, Mako,

Pearl Harbor & Other Lot (Buena Vista, 2001). Rolled, Very Fine-. | Lot #53386 | Heritage Auctions

Pearl Harbor (film) Distribution : pearl, harbor, (film), distribution, Pearl, Harbor, Other, (Buena, Vista,, 2001)., Rolled,, Fine-., #53386, Heritage, Auctions

Pearl Harbor Movie Poster — Martha Mundorff Humphrey

Pearl Harbor (film) Distribution : pearl, harbor, (film), distribution, Pearl, Harbor, Movie, Poster, Martha, Mundorff, Humphrey

Midway (2019 Film) - Wikipedia

Pearl Harbor (film) Distribution : pearl, harbor, (film), distribution, Midway, (2019, Film), Wikipedia Pearl Harbor: Ben Affleck, Josh Hartnett, Michael Bay: Movies & TV

Pearl Harbor (film) Distribution : pearl, harbor, (film), distribution,, Pearl, Harbor:, Affleck,, Hartnett,, Michael, Movies

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *